Instructor’s Manual for Macroeconomics, Fourth Canadian Edition
market, each individual must consume exactly his or her current disposable income in
each and every period of time. However, many consumers would prefer to consume more
or less than their current disposable income in each period. Credit markets allow some
consumers to be better off by redistributing consumption over time. Each consumer may
also choose not to participate in the credit market, and these consumers can be no worse
off for the existence of a credit market. The existence of credit markets must therefore
allow a Pareto improvement.
An important first step for students is that they fully understand the meaning of the
intertemporal budget constraint. The first key point is that, for given amounts of income,
consumption in the present can only be changed if there is a corresponding change in
future consumption. At an intuitive level, this point is well understood by students taking
out loans for college expenses. However, students are naturally focused on making
decisions about current consumption and often lose sight of the fact that current choices
effectively preclude alternative future choices. One natural example of choice over time
is consumers’ responses to lottery winnings. Does the choice of a lump-sum payoff as
opposed to a series of annual payments affect current consumption? Does it affect current
savings? How would students respond to improved prospects for future employment
income?
Students should also understand that there is more to a change in the interest rate than an
incentive (substitution) effect acting on the returns to saving. Students should ponder the
question of who wins and who loses from changes in interest rates. Can everyone win?
Can everyone lose?
The final and often most challenging issue is Ricardian equivalence. Students often find it
difficult to conceive of tax changes that do not, at least implicitly, involve changes in
CLASSROOM DISCUSSION TOPICS
One good way to get the ball rolling is to list some macroeconomic concerns students
may have. Ask students what they think about cultural and religious admonitions against
borrowing. Should everyone respect the principle, “Neither a borrower nor a lender be?”
What about usury prohibitions on charging any interest to borrowers? There are often
tales of woe in the popular press about taking on too much consumer debt. In the modern