Chapter 21 The Role of Expectations in Macroeconomic Policy 241
Chapter Overview and Teaching Tips
Part Eight of the book examines the latest developments in business cycle theory that have been driven by
a greater focus on microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic analysis. Over the last thirty years, the
role of the public and the market’s expectations has moved to the front and center of the thinking about
To put rational expectations theory in context, the chapter starts by discussing an older theory, adaptive
expectations, which just states that expectations are formed from past realizations of the data. It then
defines rational expectations as the optimal forecast (best guess) of the future using all available
information. There are five key points to help students understand this concept. First, it is derived from
The chapter next uses the concepts above to outline one of the most important ideas in macroeconomics in
the last thirty years, the Lucas critique, which says that macro-econometric relationships based on past
data will change when the way policy is conducted is changed, so policy evaluation with these models can
be very misleading. The intuition behind the Lucas critique is illustrated in an application with a simple
example using the consumption function. There are numerous other examples, an instructor might want to
discuss in class.
The chapter next turns to a set of policy issues. The first is the debate over whether policy makers should
follow rules or instead conduct policy with complete discretion, in which policy is conducted on a day-to–
day basis. The argument for rules is based on the time-inconsistency problem, another one of the most
important ideas in macroeconomics over the last thirty years. The problem with discretion is that policy
The next policy issue the chapter discusses is the role of credibility and a nominal anchor. Here, the rational
expectations conclusion that expectations about policy affect inflation expectations is embedded in the AD/AS
model, which is then used to show that having a credible commitment to a nominal anchor produces better
outcomes on both inflation and output when there are either demand or supply shocks. To demonstrate to