11. Who are the winners and losers when a mortgage company lends $100,000 to
the Miller family to buy a house worth $105,000 and during the first year prices
unexpectedly fall by 10%? What would you expect to happen if the deflation con-
tinued over the next few years? How would continuing deflation affect borrowers
and lenders throughout the economy as a whole?
11. Over the first year, as prices fall 10%, the value of the Millers’ house will fall from
$105,000 to $94,500. Since they borrowed $100,000 to buy it, the value of the house
is now less than the amount they owe. If they sold the house, they would not be
able to pay off their mortgage. The Millers are worse off. The mortgage company
is better off because as the Millers pay off their mortgage, the mortgage company
will be able to lend to more potential homeowners. As the deflation continues, it
will become harder and harder for the Millers to pay off their mortgage. Assum–
ing wages are falling with deflation, the Millers will have to work more hours to
WORK IT OUT Interactive step-by-step help with solving this
problem can be found online.
12. Due to historical differences, countries often differ in how quickly a change
in actual inflation is incorporated into a change in expected inflation. In a
country such as Japan, which has had very little inflation in recent memory,
it will take longer for a change in the actual inflation rate to be reflected
12. Countries such as Japan will find that they can sustain an unemployment rate
lower than the NAIRU for longer periods of time before the expected rate of
inflation increases than can countries such as Zimbabwe. So Japanese mon-
etary and fiscal policy will be more effective than Zimbabwean monetary and
fiscal policy in reducing unemployment below the NAIRU. However, given a
sufficiently long period of higher-than-expected inflation, the Japanese people