Chapter 16: Money in the Open Economy
chapter all rely on purchasing power parity, and yet evidence suggests that this
relationship is not reliable when dealing with short-horizon developments. In this regard,
it is useful to point out that deviations from purchasing power parity are typically due to
real, as opposed to nominal, factors.
The models developed in this chapter are all classical in nature. Therefore, the nominal
price level has no direct influence on individual welfare or the allocation of resources. A
CLASSROOM DISCUSSION TOPICS
Many times students are disappointed with economics because the discipline rarely offers
strategies for reaping windfall gains. Ask students if they have ever thought of foreign-
exchange speculation as a source of livelihood. Can students work out the proper strategy
if they are confident in their ability to predict future movements in nominal exchange
rates? Is the possibility of windfall profits limited to the case of flexible exchange rates?
Would it be useful to be able to predict devaluations? Remind students that their ability to
forecast must be better than market forecasts. Ask students about the likely consequences
of a widespread change in market expectations about exchange rate movements.
Unfortunately, this point brings us back to the difficulties in making quick money from
learning about economics.
Economists’ theories of exchange rates are very well developed, especially after hundreds
of years of experience. How precisely do you think financial market participants, such as
currency traders, can forecast exchange rates?
It turns out that despite all our economic theories and extensive empirical work, forecasts
of exchange rates are notoriously bad over short horizons. For long time periods, like two