Instructor’s Manual 15-6
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
o Tannenbaum (2003) proposed the Star Model for explaining giftedness as the
dynamic and static interaction of innate abilities, special aptitude, non-
• 15-5 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF PEOPLE WHO ARE
GIFTED, CREATIVE, AND TALENTED
o The focus of assessment procedures for identifying potential giftedness is
beginning to change. Elitist definitions are being replaced with defensible,
inclusive definitions.
o Tests for identifying children who are gifted are being more carefully selected
and are being used with the children or youth for which they were designed.
o Children who were once excluded from programs for the gifted are now
included as candidates.
o Multiple sources of information are now collected and reviewed to determine
who is potentially gifted.
o The identification process is now directed at recognizing needs and potentials
potentially gifted using various measures, and has changed from a one-
dimensional to a multidimensional approach. Many districts are using
Renzulli’s (2003) talent pool strategy, which is an integral part of the
Schoolwide Enrichment Theory, which includes liberal percentages of students
who may qualify and participate, a focus on ongoing identification, and access
for children and youth who may not be readily recognized or assessed.
o 15-5a Teacher Nomination
! Teacher nomination has been an integral part of many screening
approaches, however, there are problems with this method:
• Teachers often favor children who are cooperative, well-mannered,
o 15-5b Intelligence and Achievement Tests
! Intelligence and achievement tests are used to identify intellectual
giftedness; however, they must be carefully selected to avoid issues like