Further discussion of Operating Leverage (Beyond the scope of Concise FFM, but interesting)
1. The beta of the ith asset can be found using this equation:
3. We could calculate the historical R between some traded assets and the market,
and make an educated guess about R for non-traded assets, like Bigbee’s project.
5. We calculated above the s for A and B as follows:
These betas could be used in the Hamada equation as described
below to bring in financial risk and thus to get an idea of total risk with
different operating and financial plans.
The results generated in the table above are graphed here:
(1) B has a much higher break-even point, and (2) B has more operating leverage in the sense that a given change
in sales leads to a larger change in profits than for A.
We can see from the graph that A‘s break-even point is between 40,000 and 60,000 units and that B’s break-even
point is between 60,000 and 80,000 units, but we cannot tell the exact points. However, we can use the following
formula to find the exact break-even point for both plans:
At this point, we know that Plan B has a higher expected rate of return, but it is also more risky. Our analysis is
based on stand-alone risk. However, given a positive correlation between the firm’s returns and that on the market,
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$50,000
Revenues and
Costs
Plan A: Low Fixed Costs,
Low Operating Leverage
2. We could estimate the s of the market, based on historical data. The
approximate s for large company stocks is 27.9%, and 25.76% for small
company stocks. Assume s Market = 25%