g. Note that “best-case” values for variable costs, fixed costs, WACC, and equipment cost are
20% less than base-case values, while the “worst-case” values for variable costs, fixed costs,
WACC, and equipment cost are 20% higher than base-case values.
Squared
Deviation
Sales Variable Unit Fixed Equipment Times
Scenario Probability Price Costs Sales Costs WACC Cost NPV Probability
Best Case 25% $3.90 $1.56 138,000 $56,000 8% $140,000 $415,716 33746517548
a. Probability Graph Probability
50%
25%
b. Continuous Approximation
Probability Density
(263,483) 0 48,312 415,716
NPV ($)
20,507
The scenario analysis suggests that the project could be highly profitable, but also that it is
quite risky. There is a 25% probability that the project would result in a loss of $263,483.
There is also a 25% probability that it could produce an NPV of $415,716. The standard
deviation is high, at $241,738, and the coefficient of variation is high, 5.00.
h. A risk-adjusted discount rate is the cost of capital appropriate for a given project, given the
riskiness of that project. The greater its risk, the higher the project’s cost of capital. If Cory
used a risk-adjusted discount rate, this project’s cost of capital would be increased above the
firm’s 10% WACC to reflect its greater risk as determined from the project’s CV of 5.00. If Cory
increased the WACC used to analyze this project’s NPV by 2 percentage points, then this