11-7. As in Problem 11-6, suppose that there is a temporary, but significant, increase in oil prices
in an economy with an upward-sloping SRAS curve. In this case, however, suppose that
policymakers wish to prevent equilibrium real GDP from changing in response to the oil
price increase. Should they increase or decrease the quantity of money in circulation? Why?
11-8. Based on your answers to Problems 11-6 and 11-7, can policymakers stabilize both the price
level and real GDP simultaneously in response to a short-lived but sudden rise in oil prices?
Explain briefly.
11-9. Between early 2005 and late 2007, total planned expenditures by U.S. households
substantially increased in response to an increase in the quantity of money in circulation.
Explain, from a short-run Keynesian perspective, the predicted effects of this event on the
equilibrium U.S. price level and equilibrium U.S. real GDP. Be sure to discuss the spending
gap that the Keynesian model indicates would result in the short run.
11-10. Between early 2008 and the beginning of 2009, a gradual stock-market downturn and
plummeting home prices generated a substantial reduction in U.S. household wealth that
induced most U.S. residents to reduce their planned real spending at any given price level.
Explain, from a short-run Keynesian perspective, the predicted effects of this event on the
equilibrium U.S. price level and equilibrium U.S. real GDP. Be sure to discuss the spending
gap that the Keynesian model indicates would result in the short run.
11-11. For each question that follows, suppose that the economy begins at point A. Identify which
of the other points on the diagram—point B, C, D, or E—could represent a new short-run
equilibrium after the described events take place and move the economy away from point
A. Briefly explain your answers.