Schram, Introduction to Criminology 3e
SAGE Publishing, 2021
D. Reaction and Research
i. It has been argued that Shaw and McKay’s original research did not actually
measure their primary construct: social disorganization.
ii. Additional criticisms of Shaw and McKay’s formulation of social
disorganization also focus on the emphasis the theory places on the macro, or
aggregate, level of analysis.
iii. Their model does not attempt to explain why some, albeit a very small
amount of, youths in the best neighborhoods (in Zone V) choose to commit
crime.
III. Cultural and Subcultural Theories of Crime
i. Assume that there are unique groups in society that socialize their children to
believe that certain activities that violate conventional law are good and
positive ways to behave.
A. Early Theoretical Developments and Research in Cultural/Subcultural Theory
i. Ferracuti and Wolfgang’s primary conclusion was that violence is a culturally
ii. They proposed that no subculture can be totally different from or totally in
conflict with the society of which it is a part.
iii. Cultural/subcultural theory: A perspective on criminal offending that
assumes that many offenders believe in a normative system distinctly different
from and often at odds with the norms accepted by conventional society.
iv. Miller presented a theoretical model that proposed that the entire lower class
had its own cultural value system.
v. In this model, virtually everyone in the lower class believed in and socialized
the values of six focal concerns: fate, autonomy, trouble, toughness,
excitement, and smartness.
a. Fate was the concern of luck, or whatever life dealt you; it
disregarded responsibility and accountability for one’s actions
b. Autonomy was the value of independence from authority.