II. Defendants in Court
A. The defendant is supposed to stand at the center of the criminal court drama.
Yet typical felony defendants are largely powerless to control their fates; they
are more objects to be acted upon than keys to what happens.
B. Because most defendants are poor and uneducated, they are ill equipped to
deal with the technical abstractions of the criminal court process.
C. Pro Se Defendants
i. More and more court litigants elect to act pro se, meaning they serve as
their own attorneys.
ii. Although legal representation is provided free of charge to indigent
criminal defendants, not all defendants avail themselves of this right.
iii. Although a “right” to self-representation is not explicitly mentioned in
the Sixth Amendment, in Faretta v. California (1975), the U.S. Supreme
Court determined that the right to make one’s own defense is implied by
the plain language of the Amendment.
D. The Pitfalls of Social Media for Defendants
i. Modern American defense attorneys often complain that they could win a
ii. Since the privilege against self-incrimination doesn’t apply to voluntary
statements made by defendants, social media and other forms of
electronic communication may be used as evidence in court.
iii. These forms of communication have been used against defendants in past
cases (Dharun Ravi, People v. Binkerd).
III. Courts Through the Eyes of Victims and Witnesses
Learning Objective 2: Describe how victims and witnesses view the court
process.
A. Frustrations in Coping with the Process
i. Several studies have documented the hardships victims and witnesses
face while participating in the criminal court process (Cannavale &
Falcon, 1976; Connick & Davis, 1983; McDonald, 1976).
ii. Although some are minor inconveniences, such as getting to the
courthouse and finding a parking place, other hardships are more