accepts GABAa as a neurotransmitter, reducing the neurons’ firing rate. Thus, the action of the
barbiturates could be compared to the action of the fire blankets found in many laboratories;
when thrown over a fire, they not only smother the flames, but also cover such a wide area that
nearby objects are damaged as well.
Using the analogy offered above, the fire itself covers only a small area, possibly less than two or
three-square feet. When deployed, the fire blanket might cover twenty or thirty square feet,
damaging equipment and experiments uninvolved in the fire at the time. The barbiturates’
Questions
1. At what point should a compound no longer be considered advisable for human use? What
circumstances might affect this decision?
2. Are there any circumstances in which a compound with potentially dangerous side effects
should be administered anyway? What might those circumstances be, and who should be
allowed to make that decision?
Break-Out Discussion #2:
Drug development: When the barbiturates were first developed, the protocols for drug
development now used by the Drug Enforcement Administration were not in place. The
chemists who developed a new compound might be the test subjects for the same compound.
Although it is not a barbiturate, heroin provides an excellent example of this process: the
chemists who developed this compound injected it into themselves, thought that it made them
It often surprises students to learn that until the year 1938 there was no law in place that
prohibited the sale of compounds unsupported to be either effective or safe by clinical trials.
After a near-disaster in 1937 involving such a compound, Congress passed the Pure Food and
Drug Act of 1938 in the United States. Since then, more appropriate guidelines for use of human
test participants have been developed to hopefully protect the 20 million citizens in the United
States who are involved in a clinical trial of a drug each year (O’Meara, 2009).