DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Break-Out Discussion #1:
What constitutes “treatment?” It often surprises students and the general public that, unlike in
the world of medicine, there is no standard definition of treatment. While various schools of
thought might advocate different treatment methodologies to treat the same condition in
medicine, they all have the same goal: control or elimination of the disease state.
Differences in
treatment philosophies are not uncommon in the world of medicine. However, they are seen at
their most extreme in the world of substance rehabilitation. Would providing three meals a day,
medical supervision, and quiet time in which to contemplate one’s problems or walk through
the woods qualify as “treatment?” What if the client were required to attend one 12-step group
meeting a week and one educational lecture a week?
Questions
1. What constitutes treatment? Can both of the above suggestions be considered treatment?
Why or why not?
2. Imagine, if you would, an ultra-elite “rehabilitation” program that provided yachts for its
“guests” to use during the afternoons, massage therapists, tennis courts, and gourmet meals,
with the occasional optional lecture or individual counseling session. Could this be considered a
“rehabilitation” center?
3. Should a wealthy celebrity be required to attend a community support group in which other
members could violate the confidentiality of the treatment center and reveal the celebrity’s
secrets? How do you balance the needs of a true rehabilitation program, if such could be
defined, against the client’s status? Can you think of a scenario in which you would feel justified
in making an exception to the norms of treatment because of who the client was? What factors
would affect your decision?
Break-Out Discussion #2:
Treatment planning in special cases: Imagine a situation in which the conclusions of the assessor
called for a person to be admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation program. However, the
individual is unable to accept this recommendation because he or she is the primary care
provider for children or a disabled spouse, is the primary source of income for the family and
does not have health insurance benefits that will pay for residential treatment, and so on. Now
you are faced with a dilemma very similar to that of the physician who has a patient who
responds to the recommendation for surgery by saying, “I can’t afford to take time off from
work to recover! I have to find a job! Can’t you do something less drastic?”
Questions
1. What do you do if the patient’s position in life will not allow him or her to participate in the
recommended form of treatment?