sought to restrict, if not deny, its use in these religious ceremonies. The courts have ultimately
ruled, however, that the use of peyote in religious ceremonies by members of the Native
American Church is permitted as an acceptable religious practice and thus exempt from the drug
classification system established by the Drug Enforcement Administration. However, its use by
nonmembers of this religious group remains a violation of the law and peyote remains classified
as a Category I compound. In this manner, the practices of a minority population were
accommodated by that of the predominant culture.
Questions
1. To what degree has the Native American population been assimilated into the larger society
of the United States? For example, are those members of the tribal unit who live on a
reservation exposed to the same drug use “cues” as those who live outside of the reservation in
a major metropolitan area?
2. What social forces on the reservation might fuel, or inhibit, the individual’s interest in
misusing alcohol or another drug? Are the substance use cues for members of a tribe living on a
reservation in Maine the same as those for a tribal member living on a reservation in Nevada,
for example?
3. If the traditions and beliefs of a hypothetical tribe living in southern Wyoming were to inhibit
the growth of SUDs, would those traditions and beliefs be of value to another hypothetical tribe
living in southern New England? Should a single form of treatment be established for Native
Americans, or should treatment centers in each region develop region-specific treatment
modalities to accommodate the needs of the Native Americans who live in that area? Who
would make these decisions? If a person who grew up in a specific tribe in New England should
move to Washington State, should that person be forced to adapt to the treatment program
developed for Native Americans indigenous to Washington State?
4. When does a minority custom become something the majority must tolerate? Can you think
of examples other than the one above, in which the dominant culture learned to tolerate, if not
accept, the practices of a minority culture?
References
Kenneally, C. (2010). Talking heads. New Scientist, 206 (2762), 32–35.
Watters, E. (2010). Invasion of the mind snatchers. New Scientist, 205 (2744), 26–27.
LO/STANDARDS CORRELATION CHART
3d: theories and etiology of addictions
and addictive behaviors
3f: systemic and environmental factors
that affect human development,
functioning, and behavior
2h: strategies for identifying and
eliminating barriers, prejudices, and
processes of intentional and