as opposed to men, and that there are often different pathways to substance misuse or SUDs
between the sexes. This chapter thus provides an overview of this problem. The need for
gender-specific treatment facilities is discussed, as well as whether women should be referred
to a traditional 12-step support group as opposed to a gender-specific group.
Break-Out Discussion #1:
The convergence theory: It has been suggested that the percentage of women who have
substance use disorders (SUDs) is slowly approaching that of men with similar disorders. Is this
true? Society has hidden the problem of substance misuse in women for the better part of the
Questions
1. If the woman’s substance use was sanctioned by a physician, is it an SUD, or just a woman
receiving another prescription?
2. Should multiple prescriptions for a compound with a moderate or high misuse potential be
counted as part of the substance use problem in this country?
3. What statistics comparing SUDs in men and women can you find? Is the percentage of women
with an SUD approaching that of men, or is it just that society is able to recognize such problems
now?
4. Your text notes that not all substance rehabilitation programs offer gender-specific
treatment. But what should be included in a “gender-specific” rehabilitation program? Why
those components and not others? If a hypothetical woman is admitted to a male-dominated
rehabilitation program and is handed a booklet on recovery for women, does that make the
program “gender specific?”
5. Does “gender specific” mean only specifically for women, or are there “gender-specific”
programs for men as well? Should such programs be offered? Why, or why not?
Break-Out Discussion #2:
Childhood sexual abuse and subsequent development of substance use disorders: One of the
more controversial theories concerning substance misuse is whether there is a causal
The apparent relationship between childhood sexual abuse and the later development of SUDs