6. Divide the class into small groups (or into two groups if the class is not large). Assign
groups to be for or against the legalization of marijuana. Have the groups debate the
issue. [LO 3]
Case Analysis and Writing Exercises
1. Is a driver suffering from “sleep driving” because of a reaction to the prescription sleep aid
Ambien guilty of DUI? If so, does the sleep driving constitute a defense under the DUI statute?
Do DUI statutes have a mental state requirement? See Leeka v. State, 461 S.W.3d 331 (Ark.
2015). Is the dissent right?
2. Some states have a state statute similar to the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act,
discussed in this chapter. Idaho is such a state: The Idaho Free Exercise of Religion Protection
Act (FERPA) states that government may not substantially burden the exercise of religion by
laws of general application (like criminal laws) unless there is a “compelling state interest” in
having the law. In State v. Cordingly, 302 P.3d 730 (Idaho App. 2013) the court found that the
state’s controlled substances law “substantially burdened” defendant’s actions as a member of the
“Church of Cognitive Therapy”. Why didn’t the court reverse the defendant’s conviction? Was
he “exercising” a religion when he used controlled substances (marijuana)?
3. In every state, the penalty for possession of controlled substances with the intent to deliver (sell)
is much greater than possession for personal use. As noted in this chapter, proof of intent to
deliver is frequently done by circumstantial evidence. Is there sufficient evidence for proof of
intent if: (1) the police observe a “frantic” woman flag down defendant’s SUV, reach into the
SUV and hand something to the driver, and take something from the driver? The driver is
subsequently stopped and police find 2.5 grams of crack cocaine hidden in the ceiling of the
SUV. (2) The police search the SUV and find neither cash nor packaging, nor do they find drug
paraphernalia like a crack pipe. If this isn’t enough proof, what additional factors convinced the
4. Most states have statutes permitting the seizure and forfeiture of contraband, including money
related to the illegal sale of controlled substances. Texas has a forfeiture statute for contraband,
including cash used in drug trafficking. Was the trial court correct to order seizure of cash found
in defendant’s possession in Approximately $31,421.00 v. State, 2015 WL 7730827 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2015)? What, in your view, was the most significant fact pointing to the cash being part of