shoplifters or can the loss prevention officers physically restrain a suspect? What are the
legal ramifications of this policy? [LO 5, 6]
4. Using the internet research the laws on uttering and forgery in your state. What are the
punishments? How is a punishment increased? Do you think that the punishments are
severe enough? What do you believe is the best punishment for this type of crime? [LO
5. Explain how a check kiting scheme works. Why is it that this crime will likely be reduced
Case Analysis and Writing Exercises
1. When a person rents furniture for home use from a rent-to-own company, the rental
agreement states that unless the renter elects to purchase the furniture, it must be returned at a
stated period, or at once in the event of a default in rental payment. If a renter misses several
payments, but does not return the rented furniture to the rental company, can the renter be
prosecuted for theft? If so, what must the prosecution prove? Do you think the prosecution
proved its case in State v. Latham, 970 N.E.2d 1169 (Ohio App. 2012)? Or do you think the
dissenting judge was correct?
2. If an elderly father puts his daughter’s name on his accounts at a bank and an investment
company as a “joint owner”, with instructions that she may deposit and withdraw funds from
the accounts, can the daughter be convicted of theft for such withdrawals? If so, under what
3. In Boyd v. Commonwealth, 357 S.W.3d 216 (Ky. App. 2011) the defendant was convicted of
possession of counterfeit currency under Kentucky law. (The federal crime of counterfeiting
is discussed in Chapter 15.) The elements of that crime include proof that the bills possessed
were counterfeit, and that the defendant possessed the bills with the intent to pass the bills
and defraud another person. Defendant had two counterfeit hundred-dollar bills in her purse.
How did the state prove the required “intent to pass” element? If you were the judge, would
you have reached the same result as did the court?
4. Degrees of theft often depend on the value of the stolen items. The higher the value, the
greater the offense and punishment. How is value to be determined? It is the state’s burden to
prove value, and a failure to do so will normally result in a not guilty verdict. If the owner of
the stolen goods must establish the value (as is often the case), how does he or she do that?
Consider the failure of proof of value of the prosecution in State v. Sanchez, 101 So.3d 1283
(Fla. App. 2012). What should it have done?