© 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password–
protected website for classroom use.
(d) Courts also want to prevent frivolous lawsuits.
2. Lawsuits against the U.S. Government
a. Plaintiffs can pursue FTCA actions to sue the U.S. government.
(2) The U.S. government’s “deep pockets” make FTCA actions attractive.
(3) Plaintiffs can pursue both FTCA and Bivens actions.
E. Suing state officers.
1. State tort actions
a. Most illegal police acts are also state torts.
b. Tort law gives injured plaintiffs the right to recover damages.
c. State tort actions balance the need for officer discretion and protecting officers.
2. U.S. Civil Rights actions (§ 1983 actions)
a. Plaintiffs can go into federal courts to sue state, county, and municipal officers for
violations of their constitutional rights.
b. Elements of § 1983 include:
(2) Officers’ actions caused deprivation of a constitutional right.
c. Liability is for deliberate (not negligent or accidental) acts of officers.
d. Liability may be limited by the qualified immunity defense (same as Bivens and
FTCA).
F. Suing local governments
1. Local government tort actions
a. State and local governments are liable for their employees’ torts (respondeat
(1) Based on the need for effective law enforcement and (2) the need to avoid
2. Local government U.S. Civil Rights Act (§ 1983) actions against state and local
government
a. Elements of state and local government liability include:
(1) Officers acted according to either officially approved written policies or
unwritten customs.
b. It’s more complicated to prove government liability than an individual’s (even
though proving individual liability is also complicated).
III. Law Enforcement Duty to Protect
Learning Objective 6: Understand that the Constitution places no duty on officers to protect
individuals from each other, and that it doesn’t create a right of private parties to sue officers for
failing to prevent crime. Understand the “special relationship” and “state–created danger”
exceptions to the no-duty-to-protect rule.