Module 19 krugman 2
Opening Example: The opening story discusses a choice faced by many people every year, namely the
I. Behavioral Economics
A. Behavioral economics studies why it is rational for people to sometimes make less-than-
perfect choices.
B. Rational, but human, too
1. People sometimes make less-than-optimal choices because they are concerned about
fairness.
2. A decision maker operating with bounded rationality makes a choice that is close to
but not exactly the one that leads to the best possible economic outcome. A person
makes a less-than-perfect choice because the effort of finding the best payoff is too
costly.
3. People are sometimes risk averse and will sacrifice some economic payoff in order to
avoid a potential loss.
C. Irrationality: an economist’s view
1. An irrational decision maker chooses an option that leaves him worse off than if he
had chosen another available option.
2. People’s irrational behavior stems from six mistakes:
a. Misperceptions of opportunity cost—for example, including a sunk cost or
ignoring an implicit cost.
b. Overconfidence—for example, assuming your finances are better than they
actually are.
c. Unrealistic expectations about future behavior—for example, assuming you will
study twice as hard tomorrow.
d. Mental accounting, or the habit of making some dollars worth more than other
dollars. For example, people often spend more if they use a credit card.
e. An oversensitivity to loss (or loss aversion), leading to unwillingness to recognize
a loss and move on; for example, refusing to sell a stock that is not performing
well.
f. Status quo bias, or the tendency to avoid making a decision and to stick with the
status quo.
D. Rational models for irrational people?
1. Models based on rational behavior still provide good predictions for most markets.
2. People sometimes behave more rationally over time, justifying the use of models
based on rational behavior.
3. Models based on rational behavior are much simpler to work with.
Case Studies in the Text
Economics in Action
In Praise of Hard Deadlines—This EIA describes the results of an experiment wherein three classes
were given assignment schedules with different deadlines. The grades were then compared in order to
learn more about the decisions the students made under each assignment schedule.