The Hidden World of Chili Peppers
Needs Improvement Version
Commentary
When showing the needs improvement version of “The Hidden World of Chili Peppers,” have students
focus on the speaker’s organization, development of ideas, delivery, and use of visual aids. Follow with a
brief class discussion about each of these aspects of the speech. Then show the final version of the
speech. Again, have students focus on the speaker’s organization, development of ideas, delivery, and
use of visual aids. Follow with a class discussion that compares and contrasts the two versions of the
speech and explores why the final version is superior.
Video of both versions of the speech is available online and on the DVD of student speeches that
accompanies this edition of The Art of Public Speaking. For the text and a detailed discussion of the final
version, see pages 363–366 of this manual. Below is a synopsis of the needs improvement version.
Organization: The introduction consists of paragraph 1. The speaker does a good job revealing the topic,
but he fails to relate it to his audience, noting only that chili peppers are one of his favorite foods and
are therefore a topic of interest to him. Nor does he establish his credibility. Presumably his interest in
the subject has led him to do research on it in preparation for the speech, but there is no mention of
it in the introduction. The introduction also lacks a preview statement of the main points that will be
covered in the body of the speech.
The body of the speech is organized in topical order. The first main point deals with the
history of chili peppers (paragraph 2), the second with the reasons why some chili peppers are
so hot (paragraphs 3–5), the third with how to counteract the effects of a too–hot pepper (para-
graph 6), and the fourth with nonculinary uses of chili peppers (paragraphs 7–8). These are the
same main points as in the final version of the speech, but they are much less effective in this
version. One reason, as we shall see shortly, is that the ideas are woefully underdeveloped.
Another reason is that the main points are not clearly stated in the speech and the speaker
does not provide connectives to help the audience follow him from point to point. As a result,