The Survivors
Commentary
An excellent commemorative speech, “The Survivors” functions at several levels. At one level, it pays
tribute to the speaker’s grandparents, who lived through Hitler’s concentration camps in World War II. At
another level, it honors those Jews who lost their lives in the camps. At yet another level, it is a celebra-
tion of human pride, freedom, and dignity in the face of tyranny and oppression. The speech also illus-
trates the differences between a commemorative speech and an informative speech. Although the
speaker provides information about the Holocaust and her grandparents, she does not go into historical
detail about either. Rather, she deals with her grandparents’ experiences at a very general level and re-
lates those experiences to larger issues of freedom and tolerance. Here is a synopsis of the speech.
Introduction: As in many commemorative speeches, there is no visible break between the introduction
and the body of “The Survivors.” The best way to parse the introduction of this speech is to see
it as running through paragraph 5. This is an unusually long introduction, but it works well to get
the audience involved in the speech. After opening with a story about a Jewish prisoner who is
Body: The body of the speech (paragraphs 6–10) focuses on the speaker’s grandparents. In paragraph
6, she discusses her grandparents’ experiences during the war. In paragraphs 7–8, she relates
her grandparents’ story to “the struggles which so many people grapple with today.” In paragraph
9, she notes that she will continue to tell her grandparents’ story so people will not forget the hor-
rors of the Holocaust or the heroism of its victims. In paragraph 10, she ends the body with the oft-
quoted statement of Elie Wiesel that “Not to transmit an experience is to betray it.”
Conclusion: The conclusion is made up of the last three paragraphs, the first two of which continue the
speaker’s use of repetition and parallelism and restate her tribute to the victims of the
Holocaust. The final sentence gives a sense of unity to the entire speech by reiterating the
dying words of the man in the opening story. It also ends the speech on a powerful note by
reinforcing the speaker’s opposition to tyranny wherever it might occur around the globe.
______________________________