vaguely to “information I found online,” without telling us where she found the in-
formation and why it is reliable. Also in paragraph 5, she cites Amanda DeMatto,
but leaves us wondering who DeMatto is.
Conclusion: Paragraphs 8–9 constitute the conclusion of the speech. The speaker begins
paragraph 8 by signaling that her speech is coming to an end. However, she fails to
reinforce her central idea, stating only that she hopes the audience can one day
visit a supervolcano like she did. Then paragraph 9 arrives out of the blue, as
though the speaker forgot to include some information earlier but feels compelled
to add it here. The conclusion of the final version is much stronger; it effectively
summarizes the main points, reinforces the central idea, and ends with a meaning-
ful closing line.
Visual Aids: Although a speech on supervolcanoes almost begs for the inclusion of visual
aids, those in the needs improvement version are not designed or displayed as well
as they should be. In paragraph 2, for instance, the speaker presents video of Old
Faithful at Yellowstone National Park from her visit the previous summer. Unfortu-
nately, the video is hard to see, the colors of the slide are not well chosen, and the
slide remains on screen far too long. Realizing the error in paragraph 4, the speaker
finally moves past the slide, but she goes too far, running into the visuals for subse-
quent parts of the speech. Also in paragraph 4, she shows a picture of a regular
volcano because, as she says, “there are no pictures of supervolcanoes.” This is
true, but why show the picture at all unless you’re going to use it to illustrate a spe-
cific point, which the speaker does not do?
The same problem arises with her visual aid of the VEI scale in paragraph 5