7. The book notes that “women face a double standard in the leadership role; they must
come across as extremely competent but also as appropriately ‘feminine,’ a set of
standards men are not held to” (Eagly & Carli, 2003). The burden to balance agentic
qualities and communal qualities is greater for women than for men. How did Ardern
experience this double standard?
Women continue to encounter this notion of incongruity between leader roles and
Potential Teaching Approaches:
This case study is conducive to group discussions and exercises. Below is a way to structure
a class, based on Case Study 14.3:
• Lecture on Chapter 14 and host general conversation related to gender and leadership.
Exercises for This Case Study:
1. The professor should show video clips of leaders in action, some male and some
female. Ask students to keep notes and record traits/skills/behaviors found in each
speaker. Following the clips and note taking, ask students to compare notes. What
traits/skill/behaviors stand out? Do any of these categories reside solely with one
gender? What lessons can be learned from this exercise?
2. Where do you stand? This activity is about physical space and personal beliefs. In
advance, create a list of 7-10 controversial statements about men and women as
leaders (e.g. to be effective, a male leader must appear to be domineering.) Then ask
the students to physically move to a corner of the room. The far right corner is
“strongly agree,” the far left corner is “strongly disagree,” and “neither
agree/disagree” is in the middle. As the question and then give them all a moment to