gross income was $1.4 million with operating expenses of $500,000, what was the tax
liability in year 2 for an effective tax rate of 35%?
Problem 13.22
A manufacturing company is considering the purchase of one of two material handling
systems. The estimates are as follows:
System 1 — P = $370,000; S = $100,000; n = 3 years
System 2 — P = $490,000; S = $150,000; n = 3 years
The plant manager (who has a real desire to reduce corporate taxes) asked you to
determine which system offers the bigger tax advantage over a 3-year recovery period.
The company’s annual gross income is projected to be $5.8 million with operating
expenses of $1.6 million. Use a spreadsheet to determine the difference in taxes between
the two systems if Te = 38% and MACRS depreciation is applied.
Problem 13.23
Last month, a company specializing in wind power plant design and engineering made a
large capital investment of $400,000 in physical simulation equipment that will be used
for at least 5 years, then sold for approximately 25% of the first cost. By law, the assets
are MACRS depreciated using a 3-year recovery period. (a) Explain why there is a
predictable tax implication when the assets are sold. (b) By how much will the sale cause
TI and taxes to change in year 5?
Problem 13.24
Cheryl, a EE student who is working on a business minor, is studying depreciation and
finance in her engineering management course. The assignment is to demonstrate that
shorter recovery periods require the same total taxes, but they offer a time value of taxes
advantage for depreciable assets. Help her using asset estimates developed for a 6-year
study period: P = $65,000, S = $5000 whenever it is sold, GI = $32,000 per year,
AOC = $10,000 per year, SL depreciation, i = 12% per year, Te = 31%. The recovery
period is either 3 or 6 years.
Problem 13.25
A bioengineer is evaluating methods used to apply an adhesive to microporous paper tape
that is commonly used after surgery. The machinery costs $200,000, has no salvage
value, and the CFBT estimate is $75,000 per year for up to 10 years. The Te = 38% and
i = 8% per year. The two depreciation methods to consider are: MACRS with
n = 5 years and SL with n = 8 years (neglect the half-year convention effect). For a study
period of 8 years, (a) determine which depreciation method and recovery period offers
the better tax advantage, and (b) demonstrate that the same total taxes are paid for
MACRS and SL depreciation.