The opposition’s fears regarding the entry of Wal–Mart into the South African retail market are not
totally warranted. The terms of the deal make it difficult for Wal–Mart to make any major changes
in its relations with its employees for some years after the acquisition was completed. Wal–Mart
was barred from removing any employees for two years and required to honor labor bargaining
rights for three years after the acquisition. Wal–Mart promised to create 15,000 new jobs after the
acquisition was completed. Wal–Mart also agreed upon a supplier development program where it
would train its suppliers in supplying goods that meet the standards set by Wal–Mart and other big
organized retailers. The opposition coalition did not have a valid point regarding the low wages
being paid to employees as the wage levels are traditionally lower in Africa than in the developed
countries where Wal–Mart operates. To counter any further opposition to its entry into Africa,
Wal–Mart should make appropriate changes to its policies related to various issues like labor
relations and procurement of merchandise.
Answer 3:
From the case. we see that Wal–Mart’s purchasing scale, low–cost mentality, and low cost
overheads provide it with a huge competitive advantage in the United States. In addition to this,
the retail giant’s merchandising skills, IT and management skills, human resource policies and
practices, locations in rural settings, and logistics are other sources of its competitive advantage.
Merchandising skills Retail being a very local activity, it is not clear whether Wal–Mart would be
able to transfer this advantage to Africa. Many retailers have failed in international markets
because they were not able to reconcile this difference. Wal–Mart itself had bad experience in
some countries, but overall it had shown that it was able to adapt.
IT and management skills These are undoubtedly the most transferable skills. The retail giant can
leverage its skills in this area and have a significant advantage.