INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL
7-4
◼ Summary of the two methods:
Two Approaches to the Allowance Method of Accounting for Bad Debts
Because the allowance method results in better matching, accounting standards require it rather than the
direct write-off method unless bad debts are immaterial. Two methods are used to estimate bad debts – the
percentage of net credit sales approach and the percentage of accounts receivable approach.
◼ Percentage of Net Credit Sales Approach
• Emphasizes matching bad debts expense with revenue on the income statement.
• Debit Bad Debt Expense, credit Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the amount obtained
when multiplying net credit sales by the percentage.
Total assets decrease, total expenses increase, thus causing net income and stockholders’
equity to decrease.
Ignore any balance in the allowance account under this method.
◼ Percentage of Accounts Receivable Approach
• Emphasizes the net realizable value of accounts receivable on the balance sheet.
IMPORTANT: This method does not yield the amount to debit to Bad Debt Expense and
credit to the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The amount calculated is the ending
balance of the Allowance account. It is necessary to consider any existing balance to
arrive at the debit to Bad Debt Expense.
To summarize: