Chapter 5
CROSS-CULTURAL NEGOTIATION AND DECISION MAKING
LECTURE OUTLINE
General Outline
Opening Profile: Facebook’s Continued Negotiations in China
Negotiation The Negotiation Process
Stage One: Preparation
Negotiating Teams
Understanding Negotiation Styles
Successful Negotiators around the World
Comparing Profiles
Managing Negotiation
Using the Internet to Support Negotiations
Managing Conflict Resolution
Context in Negotiations
Comparative Management in Focus: Negotiating with the Chinese
Decision Making
Chapter Learning Objectives (see slide 5-2)
5-1. To become familiar with the role of negotiation in implementing a firm’s strategy, and the
various stakeholders who must be considered.
81
behavioral differences, values, and agendas of the negotiating parties and how to build
trust for successful negotiations. (see slide 5-3)
5-5. To learn the complexities of negotiating with the Chinese.
5-6. To appreciate the variables in the decision-making process and understand the influence
of culture on decision making.
Opening Profile: Facebook’s Continued Negotiations in China (see slide 5-4)
As Facebook filed for its IPO (initial public offering in 2012, investors questioned the
company’s ability to negotiate further expansion overseas. Facebook has more than 1.4 billion
users as of 2015. Most of the company’s growth must come from other countries. However,
I. Negotiation by Global Managers (see slides 5-6 & 5-7)
A. The planning process depends on management’s ability to negotiate productively. In the
international arena, cultural differences produce great difficulties in the negotiation
process. Important differences in the negotiation process from country to country
include: (1) the amount and type of preparation for a negotiation; (2) the relative
emphasis on tasks versus interpersonal relationships; (3) the reliance on general
Teaching Resource: A Mexican-U.S. cross-cultural simulation based on a JV negotiation
between a U.S. and Mexican firm is available from CIBER, College of Business and
Management, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
II. Chapter Learning Goals & The Negotiation Process (see slides 5-10 & 5-11)
A. The negotiation process consists of five stages: (1) preparation, (2) relationship building,
(3) exchange of task-related information, (4) persuasion, and (5) concessions and
agreements. (This sequence is presented in Exhibit 5.2).
82
Teaching Resource: Doing Business InternationallyThe Cross-Cultural Challenges. This
video focuses on the effects of culture on cross-border negotiations. Available from Multimedia,
Inc.
5. Following the preparation and planning stage, which is usually done at the home
office, the core of the actual negotiation takes place on-site in the foreign location (or
C. Stage Two: Relationship Building (see slide 5-13)
1. The process of relationship building is regarded with much more significance in
2. It is usually recommended that those new to negotiating should use an
3. Posturing can be used as a bridge between the more formal stages of negotiating and
the stages of relationship building. This phase should result in a spirit of cooperation.
To help ensure this result, negotiators must use words like “respect” and “mutual
benefit” rather than language that would suggest arrogance, superiority, or urgency.
D. Stage Three: Exchanging Task-Related Information (see slide 5-14)
1. In the next stage, exchanging task-related information, each side typically makes a
presentation and states its position; a question-and-answer session usually ensues,
and alternatives are discussed. From an American perspective, this represents a
83
2. Adler suggests that negotiators should focus not only on presenting their situation
and needs but also on showing an understanding of their opponents’ viewpoints.
Focusing on the entire situation confronting each party encourages the negotiators to
assess a wider range of alternatives for resolution, rather than limiting themselves to
their preconceived, static positions. She suggests that to be most effective,
negotiators should prepare for meetings by practicing role reversal.
E. Stage Four: Persuasion (see slide 5-15)
1. In the next phase of negotiations, persuasion, the hard bargaining starts. Typically,
both parties try to persuade the other to accept more of their position and to give up
some of their own. Often, some persuasion has already taken place beforehand in
social settings and through mutual contacts.
of negotiation.
F. Stage Five: Concessions and Agreements (see slide 5-16)
1. In the last stage of negotiation, tactics vary greatly across cultures. Well-prepared
negotiators are aware of various concession strategies and have decided ahead of
time what their own concession strategy will be.
2. Research in the United States indicates starting with extreme positions attains better
end results.
Chapter Learning Goals – Comparative Management in Focus: Negotiating with the Chinese
(see slide 5-17, 5-18, 5-19, & 5-20)
With the increasing business being conducted in China (see Map 5.1) or with Chinese allies or
other companies, business practices there are now showing more similarity to those in the West.
However, when Westerners initiate business negotiations with representatives from the People’s
Republic of China, cultural barriers confront both sides. There are considerable generational
84
differences, with those younger people who have been educated in the West, in contrast with the
older generation, which holds to more traditional culture and negotiation strategies. The Chinese
are among the toughest negotiators in the world. American managers must anticipate various
III. Understanding Negotiation Styles (see slide 5-21)
A. Global managers can benefit from studying differences in negotiating behaviors (and the
underlying reasons for them) that can help them recognize what is happening in the
negotiating process. The Japanese are typically skilled negotiators who have spent a
great deal more time and effort studying American culture and business practices than
Americans have spent studying Japanese business practices. Exhibit 5-4 shows some
examples of differences (see slide 5-22) among North American, Japanese, and Latin
American styles.
Many aspects of Japanese negotiating style can be disconcerting and confusing to
Teaching Tip: Ask if students have been in other countries and had to bargain for a price on
something. Use this as a starting point to discuss the different profiles of negotiators.
Successful Negotiators Around the World
C. Americans (see slide 5-23):
1. Know when to compromise.
2. Take a firm stand at the start of negotiations.
3. Refuse to make concessions beforehand.
85
9. Respect the opponents.
10. State position clearly.
11. Know to move on.
D. Successful Negotiators: Indians (see slide 5-24):
1. Look for and speak the truth, not afraid to speak up.
2. Exercise self-control.
3. Respect the other party and seek solutions that will please all parties.
E. Successful Negotiators: Arab (see slide 5-25):
1. Protect everyone’s honor, self-respect, and dignity, are respected and trusted.
2. Avoid direct confrontations.
6. Controls temper and emotions.
F. Successful Negotiators: Swedish (see slide 5-26):
1. Quiet, thoughtful, polite, straightforward.
2. Overcautious, but flexible.
3. Slow to react but eager to be productive and efficient.
4. Good at controlling emotions, afraid of confrontation.
G. Successful Negotiators: Italian (see slide 5-27):
1. Have a sense of drama, do not hide emotions.
Comparing Profiles: Comparing such profiles is useful. Indian negotiators, for example, are
humble, patient, respectful of the other parties, and very willing to compromise, compared with
Americans, who are firmer about taking stands. An important difference between Arab
negotiators and those from most other countries is that the negotiators are mediators, not the
parties themselves; hence, direct confrontation is made impossible. Successful Swedish
negotiators are conservative and careful, dealing with factual and detailed information. This
profile contrasts with Italian negotiators, who are expressive and exuberant but less
straightforward than their Swedish counterparts.
IV. Managing Negotiation (see slide 5-28)
A. Successful management of cross-cultural negotiation necessitates the manager to
86
Francis, and Walls, to “invite negative, more relation-oriented (versus information-
oriented) responses,” leading them to conclude that:
1. “The software of negotiation—that is, the nature and the appearance of the
relationship between the people pursuing common goalsneeds to be carefully
addressed in the negotiation process.”
C. Cross-Cultural Negotiation Variables (see slide 5-29)
1. Successful management of cross-cultural negotiation necessitates a manager’s going
beyond generalized understanding of issues to 1) gain specific knowledge of the
parties in an upcoming meeting, 2) prepare accordingly to adjust and control the
situation, and 3) be innovative.
D. Using the Internet to Support Negotiations (see slide 5-31)
1. Modern technology can provide support for the negotiating process. As Web
applications develop, they may provide support for such things as multiple party
business transactions, international dispute resolutions, internal company
negotiations, and communications.
2. Negotiation support systems can support the negotiation process by: 1) increasing
the likelihood that an agreement is reached when a zone of agreement exists
E. Managing Conflict Resolution (see slide 5-33)
Much of the negotiation process is fraught with conflictexplicit or implicitand such
conflict can often lead to a standoff, or a loselose situation. This is regrettable, not
only because of the situation at hand, but also because it probably will shut off future
V. Decision Making
A. Negotiation actually represents the outcome of a series of small and large decisions. The
decisions include those made by each party before actual negotiations startfor
example, in determining the position of the company and what fallback proposals it may
suggest or accept.
Teaching Tip: Have your students work in small teams to discuss how they reached a decision
on which college to attend. Ask them to consider all the influences they faced. Did they disagree
with their parents? If so, how was that conflict resolved? In what ways did the decision follow
the model described in the text?
C. The Influence of Culture on Decision Making (see slide 5-35)
1. Culture affects decision making through the broader context of the nation’s
international culture and through culturally based value systems, which affect each
2. One of the major cultural variables affecting decision making is whether a country
assumes an objective approach or a subjective approach. Another cultural variable
that greatly influences the decision-making process is the risk tolerance of those
88
D. Approaches to Decision Making & Chapter Learning Goals (see slides 5-36 & 5-37)
1. Value systems influence the overall approach that decision makers from various
cultures take to their task. The relative level of utilitarianism versus moral idealism
in any society affects its overall approach to solutions.
Under the Lens: Negotiations and Decisions to Save the Eurozone System (see slide 5-39)
In 2012 a major issue at the intersection of politics, economics, and business was how
the Eurozone crisis would get resolved. The outcome of the negotiations and decisions
among representatives of the euro countries would have lasting repercussions for
businesses around the world, and European businesses in particular. At the heart of the
negotiations among the Eurozone countries and the IMF were the potential effects of a
massive financial rescue plan for Greece, which was threatened with default. In spite of
the passage of radical reforms and austerity cuts in Greece, the European Commission,
European Central Bank, and the IMF were demanding further cuts from Greece in order
to receive the $170 billion in bailout money that Greece needs in order to avert default.
Management in Action: Target: Frozen Out
Last year, Target said that rolling out 100-plus stores in Canada was too ambitious. Canada is
not a colder, friendlier version of its southern neighbor because labor and property are more
expensive. Managing the supply chain is trickier because pockets of population density are
dispersed, and brand recognition can be a curse. Canadians were well aware of Target’s
89
Chapter Learning Goals &Comparative Management in Focus: Decision Making in Japanese
Companies (see slides 5-40 & 5-41) See Exhibit 5-8 (see slide 5-42)
1. Japanese companies are involved in joint ventures throughout the world, especially with
American companies. An understanding of the Japanese decision-making process
requires an understanding of their national culture.
Although the ringi system is time consuming, the final decision can be rapidly implemented
because of the widespread awareness of and support for the proposal already gained throughout
the Japanese organization.
Conclusion (see slide 5-43)
Internet Resources
Chapter Discussion Questions
5-1. Discuss the stages in the negotiation process and how culturally-based value systems
influence these stages. Specifically, explain the role and relative importance of
relationship building in different countries. Discuss the various styles and tactics that
can be involved in exchanging task-related information. Describe differences in
culturally-based styles of persuasion, and discuss the kinds of concession strategies a
negotiator might anticipate in various countries.
Learning Objective: 2; AACSB: Analytic skills
The five interrelated phases in the negotiation process are: preparation, relationship
building, exchange of task information, persuasion, and concessions and agreement.
90
In exchanging task-related information, each side typically makes a presentation and states a
position. Then there is a question-and-answer session and then alternatives are discussed.
Americans are generally direct at this stage but many other countries tend to take an indirect
approach. Persuasion too has cultural differences in the methods used. Promises, threats,
commitments, and commands are some tactics possible. For instance, the Japanese and
Americans tend to be similar on the use of these tactics but quite different from the
Brazilians who use fewer promises and commitments. Americans and Japanese are also
more likely to use threats than the Brazilians. Exhibit 5-4 provides the complete list of
tactics and the variations among these three cultures.
5-2. Discuss the relative use of nonverbal behaviors, such as silent periods, interruptions,
facial gazing, and touching by people from various cultural backgrounds. How does
this affect the negotiation process in a cross-cultural context?
Learning Objective: 3; AACSB: Multicultural and diversity understanding
Nonverbal behaviors are the most subtle part of the negotiating process and the most
difficult for most managers to deal with because of widely varying cultural differences.
Negotiators must be aware of their own nonverbal agendas, as well as those of the other
party. Particular attention should be placed on determining which nonverbal behaviors
make the other party comfortable and uncomfortable.
5-3. Describe what you would expect in negotiations with the Chinese and how you would
handle that situation.
Learning Objective: 5; AACSB: Multicultural and diversity understanding
The Chinese place much greater emphasis than Americans on respect and friendship, on
91
5-4. What are some of the differences in risk tolerance around the world? What is the role
of risk propensity in the decision-making process?
Learning Objective: 6; AACSB: Multicultural and diversity understanding
According to research, people from Belgium, Germany, and Austria have a considerably
lower tolerance for risk than people from Japan or the Netherlands. American managers
5-5. Explain differences in culturally-based value systems relative to the amount of control
a person feels they have over future outcomes. How does this belief influence the
decision-making process?
Learning Objective: 4; AACSB: Multicultural and diversity understanding
Locus of control refers to the extent to which the manager feels that he/she can plan on
certain outcomes because he/she is in control of events that will direct the future in the
Experiential Exercise
Multicultural Negotiations
Administration Instructions
Goal: To allow students to experience the frustrations resulting from, and what must be termed,
a clash of cultures and to appreciate the problems associated with negotiating with people of
other cultures.
The Japanese team instructions are clear that they must remain almost completely stoic in the
face of anything that these American barbarians may do or say. This, they believe will, in the
long run, get them the best deal. The American team is here to close the deal in record time.
Each member of the American team has a personal (career driven) and corporate investment in
closing this deal as soon as possible.
92
The results of this clash, if the role does not break down, will be that the American team will
know exactly what most Americans have learned about international negotiationsa lack of
knowledge about the other’s culture will put you at a distinct disadvantage.
Instructions:
1. In order to minimize the time needed, the room should be set up for the
negotiation session in advance, using a rectangular table with four seats on
each side. The Japanese side should have three chairs at the table with one
chair set up behind the three. The American side of the table should have four
chairs side-by-side.
4. After the preparation time is over, the Japanese team should enter the room
first, because they must greet the Americans when they arrive. At this point,
the Americans should be brought in and the role play begins. Time for the
negotiations should be 20 to 30 minutes. The rest of the class should be told
that their role is to observe, and their observations will be part of the discussion
of the responses.
Some things that are critical to the exercise are:
Competing teams must not have any knowledge of the instructions of the other team.
93
5. After the role play, the members of each team and the observers complete the
feedback sheets in the text.
At this point it is very beneficial to record the responses on the board. Because the questions are
similar on each of the feedback sheets, the differences in the responses will be driven by the
students’ different positions in the role play and should highlight the degree of cultural
diversity.
Instructions for the Japanese Team
(To be copied and distributed to the members of the Japanese team only)
Goals:
As members of the “buying” organization you have the power in these negotiations. By
Instructions:
The Japanese team should be comprised of only men. The negotiations are taking place at the
Composition of the Japanese Team is:
One senior executive, Mr. Ozaka. He is the real decision maker and during the
negotiation session says nothing. He is given no special treatment by the other members of the
team. He sits behind the other team members and is not looked at or spoken to by his team. He
shows no emotion throughout the entire exercise. He may be interested in this product but
believes by making the Americans come back a second time he will get a better deal.
94
When the Americans enter the negotiation room, they are pleasantly greeted by Mr. Kawazaka.
However Mr. Ozaka, Mr. Nishimuro, and Mr. Sheno stand, bow slightly, and then hand their
business cards to the Americans when they are introduced. Any woman or other minority
members of the American team will not receive business cards or be bowed to as deeply as the
other members of the American team.
Instructions for the American Team
(To be copied and distributed to members of the American Team only)
Goals:
Mr. Jones and his team are here to open up the Japanese market for their company. It is critical
to the financial well-being of the company and, more importantly, to the individual careers of
the team members that this contract be closed as soon as possible.
Instructions:
The American Team will be comprised of at least one woman and have a multiracial mix, if
possible. There will be a leader and three followers of equal rank, with each of the three having
Manufacturing EngineerMr./Mrs. Smith has a Masters degree in electrical engineering
from Cal. Tech. and has met engineers from the Japanese company at various conferences.
Through conversations with them, he knows that they are looking for an outside supplier for this
particular component. If he can play a strong role in closing this deal, Mr. Jones has promised
him a promotion to Director of International Manufacturing.
95
component for a unit cost of $12.50, it is costing the Japanese at least $14.25 each. Although his
starting point for negotiations with the Japanese is in the $13.50 to $13. 75 range, he would
(with the permission from Mr. Jones) go as low as $13.00 for a large quantity order. He really
believes that they would jump on a $13.00/unit price.
End-of-Chapter Case: Search Engines Aid Decision Making and Negotiation
Discussion Questions
5-6 Compare and contrast five search engines in global business. How do they aid in
decision-making and negotiation processes? 

Learning Objective: 1; AACSB: Use of information technology
In 2015, Google was the most popular and powerful search engine in the world, followed
by Baidu (China), Bing (United States), Yahoo, AOL Global, Ask.com, Google is highly
diversified in its products and maintains sites in various languages. In 2014, Google sales
surpassed $66 billion. Search engines in global business are mostly affected by local
5-7 Within today’s global business, what do you see happening in the next five years
regarding search engines’ growth and global strategies? 

Learning Objective: 6; AACSB: Use of information technology
Search engines such as Google, Yahoo, Baidu, Yandex, Naver, and others will play a
major role in their country-specific environments because of business efficiencies and
96
5-8 Search engines carry national identities and cultures. Compare five major search
engines from each continent, based on their local markets, strategies, and national
characteristics. 

Learning Objective: 6; AACSB: Use of information technology
The search engines and their commercial identity are highly country and region specific.
For example Yandex has sponsored contests from its users for the best search algorithms
with a prize for the best. Yandex wanted to stress the shared experiences of its users
with the feeling of community that working together brings. Yandex has also hosted a
webcast where participants could interview Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russian
.