Chapter 3
3.2.37 No; as a counterexample, consider the extreme case when Tis the zero transformation, that is, T(~x) = ~
0 for
all ~x. Then the vectors T(~v1), . . . , T (~vm) will all be zero, so that they are linearly dependent.
3.2.38 a Using the terminology introduced in the exercise, we need to show that any vector ~v in Vis a linear
combination of ~v1, . . . , ~vm. Choose a specific vector ~v in V. Since we can find no more than mlinearly independent
3.2.39 Yes; the vectors are linearly independent. The vectors in the list ~v1, . . . , ~vmare linearly independent (and
therefore non-redundant), and ~v is non-redundant since it fails to be in the span of ~v1, . . . , ~vm.
3.2.41 To show that the columns of Bare linearly independent, we show that ker(B) = {~
0}. Indeed, if B~x =~
0,
then AB~x =A~
0 = ~
0, so that ~x =~
0 (since AB =Im).
3.2.42 We can use the hint and form the dot product of ~viand both sides of the relation
c1~v1+···+ci~vi+···+cm~vm=~
0:
(c1~v1+···+ci~vi+···+cm~vm)·~vi=~
0·~vi, so that c1(~v1·~vi) + ···+ci(~vi·~vi) + ···+cm(~vm·~vi)= 0.
3.2.44 Yes; this is a special case of Exercise 40 (recall that ker(A) = {~
0}, by Theorem 3.1.7b).
3.2.45 Yes; if Ais invertible, then ker(A) = {~
0}, so that the columns of Aare linearly independent, by Theorem 3.2.8.
140