Chapter 3 Solutions Fraud, Ethics, and Internal Control
Page 3-12
a. Which internal control activity was violated in order for Mr. Peterman to
perpetrate this fraud? A case could be made for any or all of the internal
control activities were violated in this scenario. With regard to
authorization, it can be said that Mr. Peterman abused his authority by
circumventing the established controls in order to carry out these
anyone from stopping him.
c. Was the city’s procedural manual adequate for prescribing internal
controls to prevent this type of fraud? Why or why not? Although the case
states that written guidelines were in place regarding the mailroom and
bank deposit policies, requirements for logging checks received and
performing an independent verification of receipts, these guidelines were
obviously not followed when Mr. Peterman stepped in. Rather than being
a problem with the documented policies, this case seems to present a
situation marked by circumvention of controls.
e. Do you think a business in Wooten could be guilty of customer fraud if it
agreed to deliver its payments to Mr. Peterman personally rather than
send them to the city’s mailing address? A business that agreed to deliver
its payments to Mr. Peterman personally would not likely be guilty of fraud.
Customer fraud requires the intent to deceive, so unless the business had
knowledge or was otherwise involved in Mr. Peterman’s fraud scheme, it
would not be guilty of customer fraud.