INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL
2-20
audit qualification in the auditors’ opinion, the auditors could only choose between rendering an opinion
that they did not believe to be true, or resigning to avoid rendering any opinion.
Ethical decision: Auditor’s report
As a member of a small CPA firm, you have been asked to review the December 31 year-end financial
statements of a small ($2 million revenue) company in an East Coast city. The company has applied for a
long-term loan from the bank. You are interested to note as you begin your review of the company’s
records that a principal stockholder is your former college roommate. You are preparing your report and
wonder about the following items:
◼ The company decided during the last month of the year to change their method of accounting for
depreciation for this year’s financial statements. You do not believe that any adjustments were
made to prior years’ reported results as a consequence of this change.
Should these items be disclosed in your report? Why or why not? If you disclose, how should your
disclosure be phrased? Should you disclose any other facts to the company, to your employer, or in your
report? Should the audit have been conducted differently? In your answers, try to keep in mind some of the
fundamental qualitative principles underlying financial reporting and cite them where relevant.
Solution
First, you probably should have stopped and called in another member of the firm to do the review the
moment you discovered the identity of the principal stockholder. Even if you have no ongoing relationship
with your former roommate (and no indication is given one way or the other), it is always prudent to avoid
even the appearance of impartiality or a conflict of interest.