Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
16.95
16.96
16.97
16.98
16.99
16.100 In all cases the linear relationship is far too weak to produce accurate predictions.
16.101 a
–5 15 25 225 –75
–2 9 4 81 –18
−
−
=
==
=n
yx
yx
1n
1
s
n
1i
i
n
1i
i
n
1i
iixy
=
20.20
6
42)(7(
52
16
1−=
−−
−
The sample regression line is
= 8.253 – 1.065x
b, c, &d
−
−
=
=
=n
y
y
1n
1
s
2
n
1i
i
n
1i
2
i
2
y
=
80.22
6
)42(
408
16
12
=
−
−
–5 15 13.58 1.42 1.118
–2 9 10.38 –1.38 –1.087
0 7 8.253 –1.253 –.987
16.102
23 9.6 10.45 –.85
46 11.3 11.78 –.48
60 12.8 12.60 .20
16.103
= 475.2 – 39.17x
7.6 185 177.5 7.5
7.5 201 181.4 19.6
8.0 206 161.8 44.2
16.104 a & b
= – 24.72 + .9675x
42 18 15.92 2.09
34 6 8.18 –2.18
25 0 –.53 .53
35 –1 9.14 –10.14
c
16.105
= –100,652 + 1,513x
80 20,533 20,388 145
68 1,439 2,232 –793
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
The histograms drawn below are of the standardized residuals, which make it easier to see
whether the shape is extremely nonnormal. It also makes it easier to identify outliers. The shape of
the resulting histogram is identical to the histogram of the residuals using the equivalent class
limits.
16.106 b & c
Because the histogram is approximately bell shaped the errors appear to be normally distributed.
There are two residuals whose absolute value exceeds 2.0.
d
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
16.107 a
c
16.108
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
16.109 b & c
10
15
20
25
Plot of Residuals versus Predicted
d
16.110
The error variable appears to be normally distributed.
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
16.111b
d
16.112
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
16.113
The error variable appears to be normally distributed.
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted
16.114
16.115
Plot of Residuals vs Predicted