30. A firm’s enterprise and equity values will increase in response to all of the following variables assuming
other things are equal except for
a. An increase in profitable revenue growth
b. A reduction in cost of sales as a percent of sales
c. An increase in the firm’s weighted average cost of capital
d. A decrease in the firm’s weighted average cost of capital
e. A decrease in SG&A as a percent of sales
Short Essay Examination Questions
INSIDE M&A: THE ANATOMY OF A M&A NEGOTIATION
__________________________________________________________________________
KEY POINTS: M&A financial models
• Help assess the impact of acquisitions and divestitures on a firm’s “baseline” forecast
• Address valuation, deal structuring, and financing questions;
• May be used by both buyers and sellers to assess alternative deal structures; and
• Help define risks associated with specific options in “real time.”
___________________________________________________________________________
Sometimes portrayed as America’s healthiest food store, Whole Foods Market Inc. (Whole Foods) was founded in
1978. Its business strategy is one of a generic differentiation in which it distinguishes itself from competitors by a
focus on organic or natural products. The firm promotes product quality by securing suppliers able and willing to
adhere to its high quality standards. The firm grows through increasing market share organically by opening up new
stores and by offering new products to attract additional customers.
What would be the likely long-term impact of such a strategy? Sophisticated firms typically utilize long range
planning as described in Chapters 4 and 5 to evaluate their ability to perform in their future competitive
environment. Financial models are commonly used to project a “baseline” forecast or reference projection of cash
flow over a number of years to determine if the firm’s current strategy results in achieving its vision and long-term
goals.
In developing its baseline financial model projection, Whole Foods had to make numerous assumptions about the
future. These could have included consumer income growth, responsiveness of consumers to rising retail food
prices, rivals increased offering of organic foods, increasing wholesale food prices, and higher labor costs due to
rising state minimum wage statutes and a tightening labor market. Additional fixed expenses like depreciation and
financing costs would have to be considered, as well as the cost of opening new stores. Based on these assumptions,
By early 2017, Whole Foods, long a Wall Street darling, had seen its shares fall by half since its all-time high in
October 2013. The firm was being whipsawed by aggressive competition from Kroger and Wal-Mart, as well as
from Amazon.com and startups like Blue Apron. Impatient with the pace of the firm’s turnaround efforts, activist
investor Jana Partners (which had a 9% ownership stake in the upscale grocer) in mid-April 2017 pushed the firm to
accelerate efforts to turnaround its performance. Threatened with a proxy fight to restructure the board, Whole
Foods argued it needed more time for its business strategy to achieve the expected results. With same store sales
continuing to decline, Jana was unimpressed, ultimately forcing the board to investigate what the firm would be
worth if sold. Consequently, Whole Foods hired an investment bank to market the sale of the entire firm to selected
parties.