Quick search
Join
Home
>
Solution Manual
>
Chapter 14 There is no evidence to infer that sales
Sidebar
Close
Chapter 14 There is no evidence to infer that sales
0
Helpful
0
Unhelpful
April 27, 2023
Related documents
Econ 120 Practice Test Answers
Chapter 1 Business And Its Environment
Sociology
Wow My Love
Case Report Laquinta
Article Review: Administrators and Accountability: The Plurality of Value Systems in the Public Domain
FC 42957
FC 62472
FIN 91396
FE 34842
Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Appendix 14
A14.
1
One-way An
alysis of variance
:
H
0
3
2
1
=
=
:
H
1
At least two means d
iffer
10
15
11
12
A
B
C D E
F G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-valu
e
F crit
Betw
een Group
s
91.43
2
45.72
1.09
0.344
1
3.16
A14.2 t-
test of
D
0
:
H
D
0
=
0
:
H
D
1
D
D
D
D
n
/
s
x
t
−
=
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
B C
t-Test: Paired Tw
o Sample f
or Means
Price sh
own
Price n
ot shown
Mean
56.15 6
0.31
Variance
243
.68 46
7.71
Obs
erv
ations
100 100
A14.3 Un
equal-variances t-test of
2
1
−
0
)
(
:
H
2
1
0
=
−
0
)
(
:
H
2
1
1
−
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
A
B C
t-Test: Tw
o-Sa
mple Ass
um
ing Une
qua
l
Variances
Leftove
r Retu
rned
Mean
61.71 7
0.57
Variance
48.99 2
03.98
A14.4 a
z-test of
2
1
p
p
−
(case 1)
:
H
0
2
1
p
p
−
= 0
2
1
p
p
−
1
2
3
A
B
C D
z-T
es
t: T
wo Proportions
Topira
mate Pl
aceb
o
b z-test of
2
1
p
p
−
(case 1)
:
H
0
2
1
p
p
−
= 0
1
2
3
4
5
A
B
C D
z-T
es
t: T
wo Proportions
Topira
mate Pl
aceb
o
Sample Propo
rtions
0.5
091
0
.166
7
Obs
erv
ations
55 48
A14.5a
Equal-variances t-test of
2
1
−
0
)
(
:
H
2
1
0
=
−
1
2
3
4
5
A
B C
t-Test: Tw
o-Sa
mple Ass
um
ing Equa
l Variances
Expen
ses MSA
Expen
ses Re
gu
lar
Mean
347
.24 47
9.25
Variance
21043 21128
b z-test of
2
1
p
p
−
(case 1)
:
H
0
2
1
p
p
−
= 0
2
1
p
p
−
1
2
3
4
A
B C
D
z-T
es
t: T
wo Proportion
s
Hea
lth MSA
Hea
lth Re
gul
ar
Sample Proportions
0
.761
9
0.780
1
A14.
6
a One-way
analysis of variance
11
16
12
A
B
C D E
F
G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Two-factor
analysis of variance
23
24
25
A
B
C
D
E
F G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-valu
e
F crit
Sample
17024
1
17024
174.85 0
.000
0
3
.87
A14.7 t-
tests of
45 minutes:
:
H
0
= 45
:
H
1
< 45
n
/
s
x
t
−
=
5
Stand
ard De
v
iati
on
3.63
:
H
0
:
H
1
n
/
s
x
t
−
=
1
2
3
4
A B C
D
t-T
es
t: Mean
45 min
utes
Mean
41.75
:
H
0
:
H
1
x
t
−
=
1
2
3
4
5
A B C
D
t-T
es
t: Mean
60 min
utes
Mean
58.75
Stand
ard De
v
iati
on
5.02
n
/
s
1
2
3
4
5
A B C
D
t-T
es
t: Mean
80 min
utes
Mean
69.05
Stand
ard De
v
iati
on
6.31
1
2
3
4
5
A B C
D
t-T
es
t: Mean
100
minu
tes
Mean
90.40
Stand
ard De
v
iati
on
12.35
1
2
3
4
5
A B C
D
t-T
es
t: Mean
125
minu
tes
Mean
110
.05
Stand
ard De
v
iati
on
17.11
A14.
8
Two-way
analysis of variance
=
=
2
1
0
:
H
3
:
H
1
F = 5.29; p-
value = .0084. There is sufficient ev
idence to infer that differences ex
ist between the estim
ated repair
costs from dif
ferent appraisers.
A14.
9
One-way an
alysis of variance
:
H
0
3
2
1
=
=
:
H
1
At least two means d
iffer
10
15
11
A
B
C D
E
F
G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-valu
e
F crit
A14.10
z-test of
2
1
p
p
−
(case 2)
15
.
p
p
:
H
2
1
0
−
=
−
15
.
p
p
:
H
2
1
1
−
−
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
n
)
p
ˆ
1
(
p
ˆ
n
)
p
ˆ
1
(
p
ˆ
)
p
p
(
)
p
ˆ
p
ˆ
(
z
−
+
−
−
−
−
=
1
2
3
4
A
B C
z-T
es
t: T
wo Proportion
s
Comm 1
Comm 2
Sample Proportions
0.268
0.48
6
A14.
11
t-test of
D
0
:
H
D
0
=
D
1
:
H
< 0
D
D
D
D
n
/
s
x
t
−
=
1
2
3
4
A
B C
t-Test: Paired Tw
o Sample f
or Means
Prior After
Mean
24.91 2
6.24
A14.12
Two-factor analysis of varian
ce
29
30
31
32
A
B
C
D
E
F G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Sample
427
.61
2
213
.81
39.97 0
.000
0
3.06
Columns
20
.17
1
20.17
3.77 0
.054
1
3.91
fitness.
A14.13
Equal-variances t-test of
2
1
−
0
)
(
:
H
2
1
0
=
−
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
B C
t-Test: Tw
o-Sa
mple Ass
um
ing Equa
l Variances
ABS spee
d
N
o ABS speed
Mean
34.72 33.9
4
Variance
25.27 2
5.63
Obs
erv
ations
100 100
A14.14
One-way analysis of variance
10
11
A
B C D
E
F
G
ANOVA
Source of Vari
ation
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Multiple comp
arisons
1
2
A
B C
D
E
Multiple Co
mparisons
A14.
15
Equal-varian
ces t-test of
2
1
−
0
)
(
:
H
2
1
0
=
−
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
B C
t-Test: Tw
o-Sa
mple Ass
um
ing Equa
l Variances
Echin
ace
a Place
bo
Mean
7.02 7.0
6
Variance
2.51 2.4
2
Obs
erv
ations
262 262
A14.
16
Two-way
analysis of variance
24
25
A
B
C D E
F
G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-val
ue
F crit
F = 3.57, p
-value = .0428. There is enough
evidence to conclude that ther
e are differences in waiting times between
the three reso
rts.
A14.17
a There are 4 levels of ranks and 4 lev
els of faculties for a total of 16 trea
tments.
b
23
28
24
A
B
C D
E
F
G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-va
lue
F crit
F = 2.84, p
-value = .0019. There is en
ough evidence to infer that at least two
treatment means d
iffer.
c Factor A (co
lumns) is the faculty. The lev
els are business, engineering, ar
ts, and science. Factor B (samples) is the
rank. The levels ar
e professor, associate professor,
assistant
professor, and lectu
rer.
35
36
A
B
C D E
F
G
ANOVA
Source
of Varia
tion
SS
df
MS
F
P-valu
e
F crit
A14.
18
a z-estimate of
p
Sample proportion
0.3569
Confidence Interval Es
timate
Sample size
1328
0.357
±
0.026
Confidence level
0.95
Low
er confidence limit
0.331
1
2
A
B
C
D E
z-Estimate of a Proportion
b
Sample proportion
0.316
Confidence Interval Estima
te
Sample size
1328
0.316
±
0.025
Confidence level
0.95
Low
er confidence limit
0.291
1
2
A
B
C
D E
z-Estimate of a Proportion
c t-estimate of
µ
n
s
t
x
2
/
1
2
3
A
B C D
t-Estimate: M
ean
Dogs
d t-estimate o
f µ
n
s
t
x
2
/
1
2
3
A
B C D
t-Estimate: M
ean
Cats