GE’s portfolio of businesses, changing organizational structure and management systems, and transforming the
culture of the corporation. The case considers how, in an era or downsizing, divestment, and refocusing when
most large diversified companies have broken up, GE succeeded in becoming the world’s most valuable
company while maintaining a uniquely broad business scope.
India. Its 96 independent companies spanned seven sectors: information systems and communications,
engineering, materials, services, energy, consumer products, and chemicals. Economic turbulence had put
a break on social and environmental investing for many other companies but renewed Tata Group’s
commitment: the Group had recently revised its charitable giving, adopted a group-wide climate change
policy, and separated its mandatory and voluntary initiatives. The case deals with the intricate connections
between the Group’s profitability and competitiveness on the one hand and its long-standing tradition of
social responsibility on the other. It explores value creation, leadership, ethics, and sustainable
development on the backdrop of rapid internationalizations and shifting stakeholders’ expectations for
corporate social responsibility.
quality products with unique designs and effective brand promotions. In 2004, Samsung surpassed Sony
to earn profits of US$9.4 billion over revenue of US$72 billion. Still, Yun felt that to compete in the
global market, Samsung’s products needed to be transformed into brands like that of Apple’s iPod or
Sony’s Walkman. This case study, while explaining the growth of Samsung Electronics, offers scope to
discuss how a change in leadership and organizational culture helps to enhance a company’s
competitiveness.