165
C H A P T E R 1 3
ORGANISING FOR SUCCESS
Illustration 13.1
Structural fault: Qwiksters quick demise
This is an interesting illustration in apparently showing over-enthusiasm in following the
prescriptions of Clay Christensen for incumbents facing disruptive innovation (Chapter 9):
splitting off the legacy business does not work here. And, if students need persuading that
structure matters, then the Qwikster experience should be enough: getting the structure wrong
knocked more than 60 per cent off the value of the company.
1. How do the pros and cons of the Qwikster structure fit with those associated with the
divisional structure (see Section 13.2.2)?
Pros and cons of the Qwikster structure: in terms of Section 13.2.2, the new structure
2. In the light of the planning, cultural, market and targeting systems discussed in Section 13.4,
what else would Netflix have needed to do to manage the separation of the streaming
business and the rental business?
What else could Netflix have done: this question points to how systems must evolve along
with strategies and structures, the configuration point of Section 13.4. Three elements are
salient in particular:
Netflix will require a new planning system, given that before everything was
166
Illustration 13.2
Reckitts new strategy and structure
1. In what ways would the new structure support the new strategy?
Reckitts strategy was focused on emerging market growth and switches from a structure
2. Assess the relative advantages of Unilevers smaller regional units and Procter & Gambles
two global business units in these consumer markets (refer to Section 13.2.4).
Unilever has smaller geographical units than Reckitt, closer to the local subsidiary model
of Section 13.2.4: this will help it be responsive to local needs in a way that Reckitt may
Illustration 13.3
Occupy Wall Street: How anarchists do structure and systems
This is an unusual organisational context, and perhaps stimulating therefore for students. They
may be intrigued by the thought that even anarchists need structures and systems.
1. What advantages did the horizontal anarchist approach to structure and systems have?
Advantages of horizontal anarchist approach: the loose horizontal model seemed to have
2. Which structures and systems appeared deficient for Occupy Wall Street?
As the strategy evolved from quickly enrolling participants for instantaneous impact to
167
Illustration 13.4
Structure, systems and saving childrens lives
This is a shocking case, and sadly is likely to have its equivalents in most developed countries.
1. List the advantages and disadvantages of the new structure and systems for childrens
services.
The advantages of the new system include:
2. What kinds of actions and initiatives might be appropriate in terms of the cultural systems
of childrens services?
The culture would have to change as well. Possible actions might include:
Illustration 13.5
Rogue banker or rogue bank
The career of Kweku Adoboli, initially such a successful management student, should intrigue
readers, many of whom may follow similar paths (though hopefully not to such a disastrous
end). Adoboli was obviously personally at fault, but UBS created a context where his type of
fraud was very likely to happen. The rogue bank in some sense created the rogue banker.
168
1. In this account, what elements of UBSs systems appear to have been deficient, with regard
to Adoboli and more generally?
Section 13.3 highlights cultural systems, performance targeting systems and planning systems.
The UBS culture showed inadequate respect for legal and ethical conduct, as evidenced
2. What roles might the merger and growth strategy have played in the various failures at UBS?
Roles of merger and growth strategy: this rapid growth strategy had led to a focus on the
headline financial figures (size in terms of fees) at the expense of the structures and systems
Key Debate
Does structure follow strategy?
This illustration both reinforces the importance of structure and raises issues regarding the
adequacy of the Design Lens for understanding strategy (see Commentary on Part I).
Instructors Manual on the Web
169
Video assignment
Wilmington and Mertapraxis
The video features Charles Brady who is the chief executive of the Wilmington Group and
David Hammond who is the principle consultant at Metapraxis. Wilmington is a UK-based
group of companies that has now expanded, via acquisitions, into an international business.
They provide information, training and other services to professional clients. Metapraxis is UK-
based consultancy specialising in business analysis and information management solutions for a
range of blue chip clients. The two executives discuss how the organisational structure has
evolved to meet the changing needs of their business.
1. Section 13.2 looks at different types of organisation structure and outlines the advantages
and disadvantages of each type. As Charles Brady explains, the structure of the Group has
changed as the nature of the business has changed from publishing trade journals to an
2. This question looks at the move to empowerment at Metapraxis and its advantages and
disadvantages. Empowerment became a big issue in the 1990s and is still an interesting area
of debate in management literature. At Metapraxis, David Hammond describes a process
that has seen individual managers given more responsibility and the power to make their
Assignments 13.1 and 13.2
Structural types
These assignments are designed to encourage students to become familiar with the basic
structural types as discussed in Section 13.2. More importantly, students need to understand the
advantages and disadvantages of the different structures and the circumstances in which they are
most likely to be appropriate (see Table 13.1). This is the way in which the discussion in the text
is organised, and students should be encouraged to test their real organisation against these
pure types of structure. It is important not to miss the following key points:
170
Assignment 13.3
Strategy maps
The advantages of strategy maps include the wide range of perspectives or goals that can be
incorporated and the way that they are logically linked into a coherent whole. As the discussion
in Section 13.3.3 points out, there are still issues of inappropriate target levels and potentially
internal competition.
Assignment 13.4
Strategy style
Most students would opt for either the autonomy of financial control or the support of strategic
control: by contrast, strategic planning would be felt too smothering. The discussion in Section
Integrative assignment 13.5
Merger or acquisition
This assignment draws on the discussion of mergers and acquisitions in Section 10.3, the
concepts of related and unrelated diversification in Sections 7.2.1 and 7.3, as well as the various
structures discussed in Section 13.2 of this chapter and the styles in Section 13.3.1.
171
Case Example
One Sony?
The Sony case should appeal because the companiesproducts are well-known to students and
there is an interesting contrast to Samsung and Apple, two other iconic brands for them. The
new CEOs career  in the music business and video games design  may intrigue them too. It is
important for students to realise that multidivisional structures (Section 13.2.2) come in
different flavours, and can be reorganised radically within the same basic structural type.
1. Assess the pros and cons of Hirais structural changes.
The Goold and Campbell nine design tests (Chapter 13.2.6) may be helpful here,
particularly the market-advantage test, the parenting advantage test, the accountability test,
the specialised cultures test, the redundant hierarchy test and the difficult links test. In this
172
Disadvantages:
Hirai will now have nine business group heads reporting to him, while he himself
manages the Home Entertainment (TVs) group, as against the six that his predecessor
had. This may be too much to handle.
Hirais slogan One Sony is ominously similar to Stringers failed Sony United. As clear
from the final comments, the Wall Street Journal appears to have little faith neither in the
new structure, nor (judging from the stock price) do the financial markets.
2. What other initiatives beyond structural change might be necessary in order to create One
Sony?
This question obviously invokes possible system (muscle) changes to go alongside the
structural (skeleton) changes that Hirai is introducing. Hirai hints at this in his quote from
the April 2012 investors meeting. The following may be particularly relevant: