174 Public Financial Management
CHAPTER 13
articles point out, sometimes there is conflict and the budget process grinds to a
halt with major repercussions. As before, each student will draw one of four recent
media clips about a recent development in budgeting.
A Federal—Do Shutdowns Save Money?
D Local—Two clips on Participatory Budgeting in Chicago
Chose one article and prepare a short solution to the “problem”
Q1 From a budgeting perspective—what is the “cost” of the problem?
Q2 Is this problem significant in terms of impact on the city, state, or nation?
Q3 Why did the “problem” develop—was it an issue with politics, or a problem
with the budget process? Is this a conflict between political parties (liberal vs
conservative) or political authorities (legislative vs executive vs judicial)?
A: SHUTTERING THE GOVERNMENT ACTUALLY
COSTS MORE THAN KEEPING IT OPEN—
MORE THAN $2 BILLION LAST TIME
Lisa Rein, The Washington Post , September 24
Budget hawks in Congress may stand their ground on wasteful spending, but
shutting down the governmentis no example of fiscal frugality.
The effects, according to anaccountingby the Office of Management and
Budget and later by theGovernment Accountability Office,also added up to
less effective government services as federal agencies spent much of their time
ramping up for a closure before it happened, then recovering afterward from
delays to their operations.
Closing the government has macroeconomic effects on economic output,
and forecasters had varying estimates two years ago on how significant that was.
Much clearer, though, were the direct costs to taxpayers.