Case 13.1: Choosing a Research Assistant
Case synopsis and analysis
Dr. Angi Dirks must select a summer research assistant. Four students are candidates, and Dr.
Dirks seems to prefer Roberto and Michelle because they both have flexible schedules over the
summer. Roberto is a foreign student who receives high course evaluations, is well liked and
needs a job to help pay for school. Michelle is an exceptional graduate student who plans to
pursue a PhD but does not seem to need the income from the summer work as much as some of
the other candidates. Carson receives excellent grades, is high achieving, cares for his family,
Learning objectives:
• Students should be able to evaluate an ethical issue in hiring by applying
utilitarianism, egoism, and deontology.
• Students should be able to apply concepts of distributive justice to a hiring decision.
Answers to questions in the text:
1. Of the four options available to Angi, which is the most ethical?
This is a difficult question, perhaps best answered by applying different ethical theories.
Ethical egoism states that a person should act so as to create the greatest good for himself
or herself. Using that theory, Angi should pick Roberto, Michelle, or Analisa. Roberto