5. Economists continue to be puzzled by the apparent home asset of investors across
countries. With mean-variance preferences, investors ought to allocate much more of their
wealth to foreign equities and bonds. Three explanations for the phenomenon are given
below, all of them based on empirical facts. For each one, discuss whether the statements
are true or false and in what sense they help, or fail, to rationalize the home bias puzzle. In
answering the questions, assume that investors have mean-variance preferences.
a. Investors should not hold foreign equities because they are more volatile and have
been yielding lower returns than U.S. stocks in recent years.
b. Home bias arises because investors face an additional risk when investing
internationally—namely, currency risk. Because currency risk makes returns more
volatile but does not lead to a higher expected return, investing more in domestic assets
is rational.
Answer: This is a much more subtle and rather sensible statement at first. Currency volatility
about as well—namely human capital. The returns to this asset can be thought of as
labor income. It has been empirically determined that labor income correlates quite
highly with U.S. stock returns.