IKEA with its roots in Sweden, which is considered to be one of the least corrupt nations in the
world, struggled very hard to traverse the corruption–laden Russian economy. Russia had
corrupt systems at both the regional and national levels, with the country being placed at 143rd
position in Transparency International’s 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index. As per the cables
published by Wikileaks, it was estimated that the bribery in Russia was worth US$ 300 billion
per annum. Analysts opined that bribery was like another taxation system in the country,
which benefited the political elite, including the police and the Federal Security Service (FSB).
2. What is the impact of strong and co–operative political machinery on the business
prospects of an emerging market? In this context, discuss IKEA’s Russian sojourn. What
should IKEA’s business strategy be in the future?
Russia remains the most prosperous of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China). It is seen as
the engine of growth for Europe, as it is far ahead of its closest Central and Eastern European
competitors, Turkey and Poland. Russia rates highly in terms of drawing foreign direct
investment (FDI), with foreign investors being attracted to its rich natural resources, growing
domestic market, and a rising middle class with large disposable incomes. However, they are
highly wary of the country’s political stability, the quagmire of bureaucracy, and the risks of
corruption.
Both Putin and Medvedev had repeatedly vowed to eradicate corruption. But the experience of
IKEA in Russia proves that there has hardly been a difference at the ground level. As long as
the local government in–charge was favorable toward IKEA, things went smoothly for the
company, sometimes happening in record time. Once a change in political leadership occurred,
things became very unpredictable for the company with permissions being withdrawn, fresh
demands being made, and new regulations being framed.