10–73
CA 10-6
In general, the inclusion of the $7,500 as part of the cost of the machine is justified because the primary
purpose in accounting for plant asset costs is to secure an equitable allocation of incurred costs over
the period of time when the benefits are being received from the use of the assets. These costs—both
the $50,000 and the $7,500—are much like prepaid expenses, to be matched against the revenue
emerging through their use. The purpose of accounting for plant assets then is not primarily aimed at
determining the fair valuation of the asset for balance sheet purposes, but proper matching of incurred
costs with revenue resulting from use of the assets.
(1) It may be true that these installation costs could not be recovered if the machine were to be sold.
This is not important, however, because presumably the machine was acquired to be used, not to
(2) Again, the purpose of accounting for plant assets is not to arrive at an approximation of fair
value of the assets each year over the life of the assets. However, even if this were an objective,
the question of which method would come closer to stating current market value at some later date
would revolve around the general trend of the price level over the years involved.
(3) Assuming that the $7,500 could properly be deducted, there would be some tax savings over the
years unless the tax rates applicable to the business were reduced during the following years.
CA 10-7
(a) If the land is undervalued so that a higher depreciation expense is assigned to the building,
management interests are served. The lower net income and reduced tax liability save cash to be
used for management purposes. By contrast, stockholders and potential investors are misled by
the inaccurate cost values. They will have been deprived of information concerning the significant
impact of changing real estate values on this holding.