B-38 APPENDIX B: ALTERNATE CASE PROBLEM ANSWERS—CHAPTER 9
claiming that the court in his third drunk driving case should not be able to count his prior conviction for
driving under the influence (to make the current charge a felony) because he did not “intelligently”
waive his right to counsel when he pled guilty to the first offense. The question asks what factors a court
9-9A. Larceny
(Chapter 9—Pages 178–179)
A Georgia state statute provides that “[a] person commits the offense of theft by taking [larceny] when
he unlawfully takes or, being in lawful possession thereof, unlawfully appropriates any property of
9-10A. Trial
(Chapter 9—Pages 187–188)
After a jury trial, Michels was convicted. He appealed to a Virginia state intermediate appellate court,
arguing that the certified documents were “testimonial in nature and, therefore, their admission in his