Module Teaching Notes
This is the first of a few modules that looks at a specific type of stakeholder: employees. Our
debate continues – should corporate leaders maximize the bottom line to the exclusion of other
goals, or should leaders sometimes “take care” of employees, even if the company will make less
money.
Employees are doubtless required for any successful operation. Without them, a company can't do
anything at all. Are they worthy of some consideration beyond the minimum required to keep them
on the job?
The scenario in this module was inspired by a real case, and I like to lecture on it in class. There is an
excellent 60 Minutes piece on the Malden Mills fire from the late 90s that you may be able to acquire, if you
want to show it in class).
In the Malden Mills case, a factory in Massachusetts burned to the ground, and the owner took the unusual
steps described in the textbook. He rebuilt the plant in Massachusetts, and, most notably, he paid his
workers their full salaries while the factory was being rebuilt. Millions in checks went out to workers, even
though, for a time, there was no work to do.
The Malden Mills owner certainly put his workers above profits. But alas, the company was soon forced to
seek chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. And so, he perhaps followed the stakeholder model too much.
It is a good idea at this point to present the shareholder and stakeholder models as “not right 100% of the
time.” Students (and business leaders) will, as individuals, tend to prefer one over the other, but it would be
a mistake, I think, to always follow one to the exclusion of the other.
Finding the proper balance between the two models is the trick.
The scenario is the second of nine overall that was made into a video clip. And so, to better spark debate,
I'd suggest rolling it before starting the discussion.
Whether you show the clip or not, keep in mind that this is a “two-parter”. The first three questions go with
the “should we do this” part of the scenario, and the last two questions assume that the CEO has decided to