MODULE 51: “Perfectly Good Items”: Wasteful Business
Practices
Core Module Issues:
• When, if ever, is a company ethically obligated to reduce waste?
• Does it matter what kind of waste is addressed?
Module Teaching Notes
This module concludes the environmental unit, and it is compliment to the #48. This time, we are
looking at general wastefulness rather than green building practices.
There are many circumstances in which companies find it cheaper to “just throw things away.”
But is it right to do so? In particular, is it right when the items that may be thrown away would be
useful to someone?
What if the perfectly good items are edible?
Students seem to like to debate the example with the strawberries that I present in the textbook
with this module. Some seem adamant that food is “special”, that hunger is a more critical than
usual issue, and that the farmers are morally obligated to put the food to use.
Others will defend the farmers and their property rights just as strongly. “Why should they have to
allow people to claim their own crops on their own land?” some will ask.
Cash for clunkers is a recent topic at the time of this writing, although you may need to reacquaint
students with the program. In this case, the government actually encouraged throwing away
perfectly good cars. In point of fact, the cars HAD to be in running condition to qualify for the
government rebate.
Now, the program did tend to reduce the number of gas guzzlers on the road, but it did have this
wasteful appearance to some. Soliciting students' comments of the relative merits of improving air
quality and discouraging wastefulness might be interesting.
It might be a nice touch to add a local- or college-lever example from your neck of the woods in
which useable items are discarded.