1064 INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL TO ACCOMPANY BUSINESS LAW, TWELFTH EDITION
EXPLANATION OF A SELECTED FOOTNOTE IN THE TEXT
Footnote 5: 1 Cache, L.L.C., applied for credit with DBL Distributing, Inc. Gary Bracken, the president of 1 Cache,
signed the application, which stated that “[t]he undersigned agrees to unconditionally guarantee payment.” The signature line
was captioned “By:” and “Owner/Corporate Officer/Partner/Principal” was printed underneath. A later version stated, “The
undersigned agrees to personally guarantee payment.” Bracken signed the later version with the hand-written notation
“president, only in his representative capacity.” 1 Cache filed for bankruptcy. DBL filed a suit in a Utah state court against 1
Cache and Bracken, asserting that he was personally liable for 1 Cache’s unpaid debt. The court dismissed DBL’s claims. DBL
appealed. In DBL Distributing, Inc. v. 1 Cache, L.L.C., a state intermediate appellate court reversed and remanded for a
possible trial on the contested facts. “[A] corporate signatory is not individually liable on an instrument that he signs in a
representative capacity,” but “[t]o relieve an individual signer from liability, the signer’s corporate capacity must be clear from
the form of signature.”
Should the court have issued a summary judgment in DBL’s favor on the issue of the executive’s liability for
the debt? Not based on the record in this case. “The guarantee language contained in Gary Bracken’s 1999 credit application on
behalf of 1 Cache, and his failure to limit his 1999 signature to his corporate capacity, create the possibility of personal liability
Suppose that Bracken had signed the credit application “Gary Bracken, president, for 1 Cache, L.L.C.” Would
he have been personally liable for the debt to DBL? Why or why not? No, because Bracken’s signature would have
included “limiting language” that clearly indicated his corporate status and his signing of the application on the firm’s behalf
(“president, for 1 Cache”). Yes, because the contract stated that the signatory personally guaranteed repayment of the debt,
and as the court stated, “clear language of personal guarantee in a document can result in personal liability despite a corporate
signature.”
If Bracken had submitted the application online, with “Gary Bracken, president, for 1 Cache, L.L.C.” typed in
the space for a signature, would he or 1 Cache have been bound to repay the debt? Explain. Yes, the application would
likely have been binding and either Bracken or his firm, or both, would have been liable for the debt. A typed signature in an e-
document can be as binding as a written signature in a hard copy if the parties to a transaction have agreed. Agreement can be
implied when the creditor makes the application available online, and the debtor fills it out and submits it via the same medium.
ANSWERS TO ESSAY QUESTIONS IN
STUDY GUIDE TO ACCOMPANY BUSINESS LAW, TWELFTH EDITION
BY HOLLOWELL & MILLER
1. What are the primary factors to consider when choosing a business form? Factors to consider when choosing a
business form include: (1) Limitations on liability. Some business forms limit the personal liability of the owner or partner of a