Module Teaching Notes
This module introduces two sets of ideas that seem to me to be very significant drivers of both corporate
and government policy. To recap the text's presentation of the ideas:
Libertarians often argue that people should keep the wealth that they generate. In politics, libertarians tend
to favor low taxes and fewer social programs, and they often campaign against governments “redistributing
wealth.” In business, they tend to advocate large salaries for employees who add large amounts of value to
a firm in some measureable way. To libertarians, an employee who brings in a large number of clients,
makes strategic decisions that increase profits, or creates valuable intellectual property ought to be
compensated handsomely, and perhaps very handsomely. The same holds true, they argue, for owners
who create enterprises in the first place.
Egalitarians do not generally favor complete equality, but they do favor providing everyone with reasonable
access to the wealth that a nation or a company has to divide. Egalitarians in politics favor, for example,
universal health care, welfare systems, and a progressive tax system. In business, they tend to favor
across-the-board raises for all workers and a smaller concentration of wealth among top executives and
owners.
Politically speaking, Republicans trend toward the former idea, and Democrats toward the latter. (You may
not want to go there, sometimes I find that discussions are better without GOP/Democrat labels, since many
students self-identify with one party or the other.)
The scenario builds upon the ideas from the last module. Students are asked to set reasonable
compensation for a CEO in one question, but they are asked to do much more with setting taxation policies
for an imaginary island nation.
There is a lot to “fill in” in this module's questions, and the students need to have done more work than
usual ahead of time. Encourage them as much as you can to come to class with their answers already in
place.
If they have done the exercise, they are often quite passionate in defending their answers. If they try to fill in