20 UNIT EIGHT: BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
fund that was distributed to employees, including Murray, Hopkins, and Ryan. Twice a year, Murray, Hopkins, and
Ryan also paid themselves additional compensation—a percentage of the net profits after profit sharing, allocated
In Rubin v. Murray, a state intermediate appellate court affirmed. A salary should reasonably relate to a
corporate officer’s ability and the quantity and quality of rendered services. Profits resulting from an officer’s
performance may also affect the amount of compensation. In this case, the trial judge found that a reasonable amount
of compensation for each officer would be 4 percent to 7 percent of net sales, plus a “success premium” related to
individual contributions, for a total of 10 percent of Olympic’s average annual net sales. This amount compared to the
average compensation for officers in similar firms.
The defendants were in effect taking disguised dividends from Olympic to avoid paying taxes. The
remedy—repaying Olympic a portion of its net profits to be distributed among its shareholders—resulted in
tax consequences for the company and the shareholders. Should the court have taken this outcome into
consideration in fashioning the remedy? Courts have considerable discretion in fashioning remedies for breaches
of fiduciary duty in a close corporation. But most cases involve a shareholder’s derivative suit brought on behalf of the
Suppose that Murray could have pinpointed a job-related basis for determining the distribution of the
net profits among the defendants. Would the result have been different? Explain. The result in this case might
have been different if Murray had pinpointed a job-related basis for the distribution of the net profits among the
What are the tax consequences of passing corporate profits on to the shareholders as dividends?
Whether a corporation retains its profits or passes them on to the shareholders as dividends, the profits are subject to
Footnote 11: Brothers Owen, James, and Theodore Brennan were the shareholders of Brennan’s, Inc.,
which operated Brennan’s Restaurant in New Orleans. Their cousin Richard planned to open Dickie Brennan’s
In Brennan’s, Inc. v. Colbert, a state intermediate appellate court affirmed. Corporate shareholders are not
personally liable for the debts of a corporation, except in certain instances of fraud or other wrongdoing, unless they
agree otherwise. Here, the brothers did not agree to bind themselves personally for any debt incurred in connection