MODULE 3: Scope of Utility – Selecting Relevant Groups
Core Module Issues:
• What is the principle of utility?
• Is utility vulnerable to criticism?
• What groups are most likely to be considered by a utilitarian thinker?
Module Teaching Notes
This module continues to put “tools in the toolbox” for ethical analysis by examining the principle of
utility. I tell students that we will study many tools for examining ethical dilemmas, and that this is
only the first.
I like to start class by repeating the classic candy bar example included in the module’s
background, and I usually ask the general question: “Is this a sensible way to assess ethics”.
Many students’ remarks will echo those of other critics. They will often remark that ethics “can’t be
about math, it must be about feelings, or about right and wrong”. Others will say that it is wrong to
let the ends justify the means. But many react positively, in my experience.
Time permitting, I ask students whether they often make utilitarian calculations when making
decisions, and whether “most people” do the same.
I don’t distinguish among Bentham, Mill, and other specific thinkers, but if you’d like to lay
additional background, they are interesting characters.
English Judge Jeremy Bentham did most of his important work in the years surrounding 1800, and
he was a man ahead of his time in favoring women’s rights, strong free speech rights, animal
rights, and an end to capital punishment. He was also for the abolition of slavery.
John Stuart Mill was a student of Bentham’s and a Member of Parliament. His 1863 book
Utilitarianism has become the best known and most widely read work on utility.
I generally end my introduction by posing the question: “If a person considers utility when making
decisions, who makes it into the equation? Which people’s ‘good’ is to be maximized?”