CHAPTER 24: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY 5
2. The Act of State Doctrine
The judicial branch of one country will not examine the validity of public acts committed by a rec–
a. When a Foreign Government Takes Private Property
The text explains the consequences of this doctrine in expropriation cases (and contrasts
confiscations), noting the burden of proof.
b. Doctrine May Immunize a Foreign Government’s Actions
The act of state doctrine and the doctrine of sovereign immunity tend to immunize foreign
3. The Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976 governs the circumstances in which an
action may be brought in the United States against a foreign nation, including attempts to attach a
foreign nation’s property.
a. When a Foreign State Will Not Be Immune
A foreign state is not immune from the jurisdiction of U.S. courts if—
• The state has waived its immunity.
b. Application of the Act
A “foreign state” includes a political subdivision and an instrumentality of the state. A
“commercial activity” is a mercantile activity that has substantial contact with the United
States.
Case 24.1: Bennett v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Maria Bennett was an American student at Hebrew University in Jerusalem when she was killed in a
terrorist attack sponsored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. Her parents, Michael and Linda Bennett, obtained a
judgment in a federal district court against Iran for nearly $13 million in damages. To collect on the judgment,
the Bennetts filed a suit in a federal district court against Visa Inc. and Franklin Resources, Inc. under FSIA
Section 1610(g) to obtain funds that the defendants owed to Bank Melli for the use of credit cards in Iran.