Chapter 13
THE UNIONIZATION PROCESS
INTRODUCTION
In the preceding chapter, we discussed briefly the National Labor Relations Boards (NLRB) administrative
structure and procedures in representation cases. In this chapter, we consider in greater detail the mechanisms
created by the Board for determining whether and how a union, for purposes of collective bargaining, will
represent a companys employees.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. Exclusive Bargaining Representative
1. EmployeesChoice of Bargaining Agent
1. Although the most common method of determining the employees’ choice of a
bargaining representative is to hold a secret ballot election, the NLRA does not
require such procedures.
2. Employers confronted by a union claiming to have the support of a majority of
*Voluntary recognition is an employer agreeing to recognize a union with majority support as the
exclusive bargaining agent for the workers in the bargaining unit, without holding a certification election.
a) For a voluntary recognition, the employer is obligated to recognize and
under Section 9(c)(1)(A). Any employee, group of employees, or labor
organization can file such a petition seeking a representation election or a
decertification election on behalf of the employees as a whole.
1. At least 30 percent of the employee group must support the election request
*Forty-eight-hour rule is an NLRB requirement that a party filing a petition for a representation election must
provide evidence to support the petition within 48 hours of the filing.
4. A Board agent is then assigned to investigation, among other things, if
representation is appropriate and if representation already exists.
*Consent election is an election conducted by the regional office giving the regional director final authority
over any disputes.
THE WORKING LAW:
NLRB Issues Final Rule to Modernize Representation-Case Procedures
The National Labor Relations Board adopted a final rule amending its representation-case procedures to
modernize and streamline the process for resolving representation disputes, which took effect on April 14,
2015.
2. Rules that Bar Holding an Election
1. The philosophy of the NLRB and the courts is that a Board-sponsored election is a
1. The contract bar rule* has two exceptions.
1. The “openseason exception is a window during which a rival
union can offer its challenge by filing an election petition.
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
*Contract bar rule is a written labor contract bars an election during the life of the bargaining agreement,
subject to the “openseason” exception.
3. Defining the Appropriate Bargaining Unit*
1. The bargaining unit is the basic constituency of the labor union; it is the group of
*Bargaining unit is a group of employees being represented by a union.
1. The bargaining unit should encompass all employees who share a
community of interests regarding working conditions. It should not be so
broad as to include divergent or antagonistic interests. Nor should it
submerge the interests of a small yet well-defined group of employees within
the larger unit.
4. Section 9(b) of the NLRA does set forth guidelines to determine what an
appropriate bargaining unit is. Section 9(b) states that the goal in defining a
bargaining unit is to “assure the employees the fullest freedom in exercising
the right guaranteed by this Act.” Section 9(b) also contains the following
five provisions:
1. The options open to the Board in determining a bargaining unit
includes an employer-wide unit, a craft unit, a single-plant unit, or
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
5. A unit including non-guard or non-security employees cannot
include plant guards or security personnel; conversely, a union
6. The extent to which employees have already been organized at the
time of the filing of the election petition is not to be controlling of
the Board’s definition of the appropriate bargaining unit.
1. In addition to these guidelines, the Board has created other factors to
consider.
1. The community of interest of included employees concerning
wages, hours, working conditions, the nature of duties performed,
and the skills, training, or qualifications required;
4. Similarity of the unit to the employer’s administrative or territorial
divisions, the functional integration of the company’s operations,
and the frequency of employee interchange and;
5. The desires of the employees concerning the bargaining unit, such
as might be determined through a secret ballot among workers
CASE 13.1 BUCKHORN, INC. AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF INDUSTRIAL
AND INDEPENDENT WORKERS
343 NLRB 201 (Sept. 30, 2004)
Background: On December 4, 2003, the Acting Regional Director for Region 25 issued a Decision and
Direction of Election in the above-entitled proceeding in which he found appropriate the petitioned-for unit
of all maintenance employees employed by the Employer at its Bluffton, Indiana facility. Thereafter, the
Employer filed a timely request for review of the Acting Regional Director’s decision. The Employer
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
The maintenance employees that the union seeks to represent occupy one of five job classifications: skilled
maintenance, set-up maintenance, tooling associate, tooling technician, and nozzle prep/build associate.
The skilled maintenance employees report directly to the maintenance supervisor. The other maintenance
employees report to the production supervisor.
Issue: Is a separate maintenance unit an appropriate unit for bargaining? Or is the only appropriate unit a
combination of maintenance and production employees?
ANSWERS TO CASE QUESTIONS
1. As pointed out in the case discussion above, the nature of the round-the-clock, 24/7 production
process throws maintenance and production workers together on a regular basis; except for the top
five maintenance people, salaries and benefits were relatively similar; maintenance people did
2. The answers are “yes” and “no” as has been pointed out above. The 24/7 nature of the operation
3. As we have seen, the Board opts for an integrated unit, despite the fact that traditional Board lore has
preferred a separate unit of maintenance employees. In addition to the factors already recited, you
may want to have your students discuss the changing nature of American manufacturing in the global
competition of today. In a real sense there is a third workforce operating on his employer’s shop floor,
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
2. Craft Unit Severance
1. The NLRB decision Mallinckrodt Chemical Works is the leading
pronouncement on when to certify a craft bargaining unit representing
employees who were previously included in a larger bargaining unit. The
NLRB’s decision in this case indicated that it will look to the following
factors:
1. If the proposed craft unit consists of skilled crafts workers
performing functions on a non-repetitive basis, or if it is a
functionally distinct department;
1. Bargaining Unit Definition in the Health Care Industry
1. The 1974 amendments to the NLRA extended NLRB jurisdiction over
nonprofit health-care institutions.
NLRB to establish bargaining units through its rule-making authority.
4. Voter Eligibility
1. Along with determining the appropriate bargaining unit, it must also be determined
which employees are eligible to vote. Factors to be considered are whether an
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
2. In general, when the election has been directed (or agreed to, for consent elections),
the Board establishes an eligibility datethat is, the date by which an employee must
be on the employer’s payroll in order to be eligible to vote.
*Unfair labor practice strike is a strike to protest employer unfair practices.
5. Economic strikes* are strikes over economic issues, such as grievances or a new
contract.
*Economic strike is a strike over economic issues such as a grievance or a new contract.
6. Economic strikers can be permanently replaced by the employer.
1. Economic strikers who have not been permanently replaced may
vote in any election during the strike, but economic strikers who
2. The employees hired to replace economic strikers may vote if they
are permanent replacementsthat is, if the employer intends to
2. Representation Elections
1. Within seven days after the regional director approves a consent election or directs that an
election be held, the employer must file an election eligibility list with the regional office. This
2. Defining Laboratory Conditions*
3. Defining Captive-Audience Speeches *
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
*Captive-audience speech is a meeting or speech held by the employer during working hours and which
employees are required to attend.
1. Actions by the employer, union, and even third parties can violate the laboratory
*Twenty-four-hour silent period is the twenty-four-hour period prior to the representation election, during
which the parties must refrain from formal campaign meetings.
3. If either party believes the election laboratory conditions were violated, that party
*Decertification petition is a petition stating that a current bargaining representative no longer has the support
of a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit.
2. An employer is not permitted to file a decertification petition; the Board will dismiss
*Union shop clause is a clause in an agreement requiring that all present and future members of a bargaining
unit to be union members.
5. Acquiring Representation Rights Through Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings
6.
1. Unfair labor practice charges filed with the Board while representation proceedings
are pending may invoke the Board’s blocking charge policy.
CASE 13.2 NATIONAL STEEL SUPPLY, INC. AND INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
TRADE UNIONS, LOCAL 713
344 NLRB No. 121, 2005 WL 1564867 (N.L.R.B.) (2005)
Facts: In response to unfair labor practice charges filed by the union, Local 713, the Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) held that the employer had committed unfair labor practices during a union organizing
campaign by unlawfully interrogating employees, discharging an employee because of his union activities,
and unlawfully discharging and refusing to reinstate the twenty-seven employees (out of a bargaining unit
of thirty-one employees) who engaged in a strike to protest the employer’s illegal actions. The ALJ also
recommended that the NLRB issue a bargaining order under Gissel Packing as a remedy for the unfair labor
practices committed by the employer. The employer then sought review of the ALJ decision by the NLRB.
Issue: Is a bargaining order the appropriate remedy in light of the unfair labor practices committed by the
employer here?
Decision: Yes. The NLRB here held that the violations were sufficiently outrageous and pervasive to
5. Other Bargaining Order Remedy Issues
1. In Conair Corp. v. NLRB, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held
that it was inappropriate for the Board to issue a bargaining order where the
6. Employer Response to Union Recognition Demands
1. In Linden Lumber Div., Summer & Co. v. NLRB, the U.S. Supreme Court
held that an employer who receives a request for voluntary recognition from
2. If the employer does engage in unfair labor practices after receiving the
union’s request for recognition, the union is free to seek a Gissel-type
bargaining order from the NLRB as a remedy.
ETHICAL DILEMMA
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
EMPLOYEE UNION SUPPORT: TO SURVEY OR NOT TO SURVEY?
You are the human resource manager at Southwestco, a small manufacturing company. The office clerical
and technical employees at Southwestco are not unionized, but the production employees are. You have
QUESTION:
The Ethical Dilemma deals with the issue of whether the employer should recognize the union based on its
claim of majority support. As indicated by the Linden Lumber case, as long as the employer does not commit
any unfair labor practices, and does not have independent knowledge of the union’s majority support, the
employer has no legal obligation to recognize the union. Arguments for recognition are that it would avoid
a lengthy and costly legal process, and would set a positive tone to the relationship with the union.
Arguments against recognition are that there is no legal requirement to do so, and that recognition could be
a violation of S.8(a)(2) if the union did not actually have majority support.
ANSWERS TO END OF CHAPTER PROBLEMS
QUESTIONS
2. The appropriate bargaining unit is the group of employees for whom the union acquires
representation rights; it is the union’s basic constituency. The Board defines the appropriate
3. The contract bar rule is a NLRB policy that holds that the Board will not accept a petition seeking a
representation election for a unit of employees who are presently covered by a valid collective
agreement. The exceptions to the contract bar rule allow a petition to be filed during the “window
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
4. Economic strikers are eligible to vote in a representation election, even if they have been
permanently replaced by the employer, for 12 months from the start of the strike, provided they have
not found other substantially equivalent, full-time employment. If they have not been replaced, the
5. An employer must recognize a union requesting voluntary recognition when the employer has
CASE PROBLEMS
6. The NLRB held that the union was not defunct because of its willingness to continue to represent
the employees; there was no evidence that the union was called upon and failed to act on the
7. The Court refused to enforce the Board’s order, and held that the incidents prior to the election
8. The union could argue that the employees who are relatives of the employer have a different interest
from the other employees and are likely to be aligned with management. The employer can argue
9. The jurisdictional issue to be addressed is whether the NLRB can claim jurisdiction over employers
in a U.S. trust territoryare they within the NLRA? The Board held that the trust islands were
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
10. The Board must first consider whether the professional employees, by majority vote, agree to be
included with nonprofessional employees in the same unit. The Board also needs to consider the
similarity of working conditions (“community of interests”) for the professional, service, and
11. The Board needed to consider the degree of independent authority exercised by the nurses in order
to determine whether they are managerial or professional. In order to be managerial, the employees
12. The Board ordered that a new election be held. The multilingual ballots were held to be severely
defectivethe flaws in translation and the difficulty in reading the ballots undermined the election.
13. The Board will regard a ballot with a mark in only one box, despite some irregularity, as a clear
14. The Fifth Circuit dismissed the challenge and enforced the Board’s order that the employer
15. The Sixth Circuit held that the union petition was not a poll; therefore, the dismissal of the objections
HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS
16. The parking lot attendants are guards within the meaning of Section 9(b)(3). They perform the
typical functions of security personnel. Therefore, they should be in a separate bargaining unit. The
Cihon/Castagnera, Employment and Labor Law, 9e Instructor’s Manual Chapter 13
17. The union has violated the NLRB election conditions. The union’s reduction of initiation fees was
not permissible even though the waiver was available to all employees; it was still conditioned
18. In order for the workers to get the NLRB to hold a decertification election, they must file a
decertification petition under Section 9(c)(1) of the act, asserting that “the individual or labor
19. It is possible that student’s responses may vary on this question. The NLRB may want to sever
glassblowers from the production bargaining unit because the glassblowers do not share a
community of interests in regards to wages, skills, training, and qualifications. They work in a
20. Unlike representation elections and decertification elections, which are determined by a majority
of the votes actually cast, deauthorization elections require that a majority of the members in the