UNIT SIX: FOCUS ON ETHICS—CREDITORS’ RIGHTS AND BANKRUPTCY 775
II. Ethics and Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy law is a balancing act between providing debtors’ a fresh start and ensuring that creditors get “a fair
shake.” The total number of bankruptcies has increased dramatically over the last thirty years. From the point of view
of a creditor, once a debtor is in bankruptcy, the asset that secures the debt often has a diminished value, or no value.
The easier it becomes for debtors to use bankruptcy laws, the greater may be the incentive to do so. BACPA was
intended, in part, to change this situation.
III. Bankruptcy and Economics
Bankruptcy shifts the cost of a debt from a debtor to a creditor (creditors rarely recover their money once a debtor files
for bankruptcy). To compensate, creditors increase their interest rates, require more security (collateral), or are more
selective in granting credit. Thus, debtors who will never be in bankruptcy may be worse off. Ethical concerns must be
tempered with economic concerns.
A. CONSEQUENCES OF BANKRUPTCY
B. INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT AND BANKRUPTCY
Before the recession, some investors chose to invest a significant amount of their funds in risky propositions with
a potential for extraordinary gains. Without diversifying their portfolios or holding funds in reserve—and
sometimes borrowing additional funds—these investors were unable to pay their debts when the market fell
during the recession and filed for bankruptcy. The overdependence on credit and overconfidence in investments
contributed to the global economic crisis that followed. This situation underscores the importance of self–
sufficiency and minimizing debt as a hedge against market fluctuations and bankruptcy.
2. Point out that questions of fairness often arise when two or more creditors claim rights in the same collateral.
Article 9, by establishing the order of priorities that apply in such situations, has attempted to resolve priority disputes
as equitably as possible. Still, situations arise in which there appears to be no way to avoid seemingly unjust results.