FOCUS OUTLINE
I. Defining Rights in Personal Property
The text illuminates the who-owns-what aspect of divorce with a brief description of the division of property in
community property and equitable distribution states. The text notes the difficulty of determining the value of, for
example, a professional license to practice medicine and an academic degree earned during marriage by one party with
the financial assistance of the other. (In most states, neither are considered property.)
II. Finder’s Rights
The text uses an early case to illustrate, in the context of finders’ rights, the doctrine of the relativity of title. If two
contestants, neither of whom can claim absolute title to property, are before the court, the one who can claim prior
possession will likely have established sufficient rights to the property to win the case. This can be the rule even when
both contestants acquired the property illegally—only the true owner would have better title than both.
III. Bailee’s Duty of Care
Both legal and ethical questions sometimes arise in the context of bailments. Bailees can limit their liability for the loss
of bailed goods, but not exclude liability for their own negligence. Of course, the degree of care required can depend
on which party most benefited from the bailment.
IV. Land-Use Regulations and the “Takings Clause”
The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives the government the power to “take” private property for public
use. The Fifth Amendment attaches an important condition to this power: when private land is taken for public use,
the landowner must be paid “just compensation.” But there is no rule for determining when a government exercise of
power will require “just compensation.”
A. THE COURTS DISAGREE
When a hurricane reduced the size of a beach, the state proposed to extend the shore by adding sand to land that
was submerged. Under state law, the sudden reduction wrought by the hurricane caused beachfront property
owners to suffer a loss, and the state’s sudden extension of the beach meant that the new land belonged to the